Difference between revisions of "Talk:55: Useless"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added comment on specific reading of comic)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
[[Special:Contributions/204.16.25.236|204.16.25.236]] 16:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)MagnusVortex
 
[[Special:Contributions/204.16.25.236|204.16.25.236]] 16:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)MagnusVortex
 +
 +
:I think the better reading is:
 +
:*What is the root of love? (i.e. Where does love come from?)
 +
:*What are the signs of love? (Sine is a periodic function, and laypeople would confuse sin(heart) with sinning against love)
 +
:*How do you derive love?
 +
:*How do you identify love? (i.e. How do you know when you've fallen in love? How do you know when someone truly loves you?)
 +
:The last one is a bit harder to interpret. Possible interpretations include:
 +
:*What is the frequency/wavelength of love?
 +
:*How often do you fall in love?
 +
:*How do you transform love?
 +
:*What is the spectrum of love? (gay, straight, bi, asexual, &c.)
 +
:*How do you find love analytically?
 +
:Randall Munroe would likely consider the possibility of multiple interpretations of the last one to be a feature, not a bug.
 +
:I worry that most xkcd readers would not realize that Munroe is posing specific questions.
 +
:—DrDnar [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.27|173.245.56.27]] 22:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
  
 
I believe the last one is:<br>
 
I believe the last one is:<br>

Revision as of 22:52, 29 June 2016

There seems to me to be a philosophical monologue going on here: What is the root of love? What is the angle of love? What is the derivative of love? What is the identity of love?

Unfortunately, I don't know much about the Fourier transform, so I'm at a loss for describing it in layman's terms. Anyone wanna lend a hand?

204.16.25.236 16:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)MagnusVortex

I think the better reading is:
  • What is the root of love? (i.e. Where does love come from?)
  • What are the signs of love? (Sine is a periodic function, and laypeople would confuse sin(heart) with sinning against love)
  • How do you derive love?
  • How do you identify love? (i.e. How do you know when you've fallen in love? How do you know when someone truly loves you?)
The last one is a bit harder to interpret. Possible interpretations include:
  • What is the frequency/wavelength of love?
  • How often do you fall in love?
  • How do you transform love?
  • What is the spectrum of love? (gay, straight, bi, asexual, &c.)
  • How do you find love analytically?
Randall Munroe would likely consider the possibility of multiple interpretations of the last one to be a feature, not a bug.
I worry that most xkcd readers would not realize that Munroe is posing specific questions.
—DrDnar 173.245.56.27 22:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


I believe the last one is:
What is the frequency of love?

-JD 132.3.25.79 18:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

For those of you who have used Mathematica, if you replace the heart with "Indeterminate", you'll find yourself in a similar situation: essentially all functions of Indeterminate yield Indeterminate. It can be frustrating. --Quicksilver (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


It is clear that the author has yet to study non-linear dynamics as this approach has already been covered in

Strogatz, S. H. (1988) Love affairs and differential equations. Math. Magazine 61,35.
Strogatz, S. H. (1994) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering. (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts)

One is forced to conclude that love is chaotic.

-Boyd 160.5.148.8 07:59, 10 October 2013 (UTC)