Difference between revisions of "Talk:622: Haiku Proof"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added a more accurate haiku)
(Added a more accurate haiku)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
I want a t-shirt with that last line on it.[[User:Aronurr|Aronurr]] ([[User talk:Aronurr|talk]]) 21:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 
I want a t-shirt with that last line on it.[[User:Aronurr|Aronurr]] ([[User talk:Aronurr|talk]]) 21:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  
Just created a more accurate haiku representation of the proof.  Couldn't fit the "QED Bitches" in though.
+
Just created a more accurate haiku representation of the proof.  Couldn't fit the "QED Bitches" in though. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.232|162.158.63.232]] 15:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 
 +
 
 
Product of all primes
 
Product of all primes
 
Plus one must be prime or must
 
Plus one must be prime or must
Contain a new prime
+
Contain a new prime [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.232|162.158.63.232]] 15:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:53, 29 December 2020

A prime number must also be a natural number greater that one. -- ‎204.8.8.13 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

I removed the paragraph about the haiku being off, as it is not "top prime's divisors," but "top prime's divisors' " (notice the second apostrophe). So the question is actually what the (prime) factors of the product of all prime divisors plus one are. KillaBilla (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

I've put it back, since the paragraph is correct - the proof is incorrect. That second apostrophe just means it is the product belonging to the top prime's divisors. The product of the top prime's divisors is just the top prime. --141.101.98.234 14:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
"All primes' divisors'" would've been correct (although the "divisors" is still unnecessary). --108.162.254.185 10:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I made a new poem: The product of all- Primes, plus one, divisors are?- Q.E.D., ******s! 108.162.216.148 23:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

I want a t-shirt with that last line on it.Aronurr (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Just created a more accurate haiku representation of the proof. Couldn't fit the "QED Bitches" in though. 162.158.63.232 15:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Product of all primes Plus one must be prime or must Contain a new prime 162.158.63.232 15:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)