Editing Talk:665: Prudence

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
 
::The probe is similar to the Mars rovers Randall drew several times after this comic, and the naming is similar to Curiosity which was Lucy's problem rather than Megan's Prudence. But interesting with the probe through portal. Have moved this down to the bottom as it has nothing to do with explaining the comic. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 
::The probe is similar to the Mars rovers Randall drew several times after this comic, and the naming is similar to Curiosity which was Lucy's problem rather than Megan's Prudence. But interesting with the probe through portal. Have moved this down to the bottom as it has nothing to do with explaining the comic. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 
:::The design looks nothing like a MALP, and it requires a cable to work.  I bet Monroe didn't even consider it.  --[[User:Rhmcoff|Rhmcoff]] ([[User talk:Rhmcoff|talk]]) 03:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::The design looks nothing like a MALP, and it requires a cable to work.  I bet Monroe didn't even consider it.  --[[User:Rhmcoff|Rhmcoff]] ([[User talk:Rhmcoff|talk]]) 03:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
βˆ’
:I'm actually watching stargate right now as I read this! I agree, very MALP like!05:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 
  
 
I'm curious to see what people think would happen in this scenario time-wise.  In the book, time passes at a very different rate in Narnia than in the "real world" - in fact, at one point, the four protagonists grow to become adults in Narnia, yet when they accidentally return to the real world through the wardrobe, only a few minutes have passed.  So if that detail is consistent here, Megan using a probe to observe Narnia from the "real world" side of the wardrobe should either cause a time paradox, or she should see things happening extremely fast through the probe. [[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]] ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) 21:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 
I'm curious to see what people think would happen in this scenario time-wise.  In the book, time passes at a very different rate in Narnia than in the "real world" - in fact, at one point, the four protagonists grow to become adults in Narnia, yet when they accidentally return to the real world through the wardrobe, only a few minutes have passed.  So if that detail is consistent here, Megan using a probe to observe Narnia from the "real world" side of the wardrobe should either cause a time paradox, or she should see things happening extremely fast through the probe. [[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]] ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) 21:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:Mentioned the time problems in the explanation for the comic that used this fact. I belive that CS Lewis only intended to write the first book to begin with. The ending does't fit well with the behaviour of Narnia time in the next three Prince Caspian books. And hence the other books does paint a different picture of how Narnia time works, and this inconsistency makes the question hard to answer --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 
:Mentioned the time problems in the explanation for the comic that used this fact. I belive that CS Lewis only intended to write the first book to begin with. The ending does't fit well with the behaviour of Narnia time in the next three Prince Caspian books. And hence the other books does paint a different picture of how Narnia time works, and this inconsistency makes the question hard to answer --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)