Difference between revisions of "Talk:687: Dimensional Analysis"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
Or, maybe the Plank Energy will decrease... [[User:Danshoham|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham|talk]]) 04:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 
Or, maybe the Plank Energy will decrease... [[User:Danshoham|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham|talk]]) 04:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
Why is he breaking from his usual black and white style? The green was a suprise [[Special:Contributions/162.158.39.207|162.158.39.207]] 22:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Davy

Revision as of 22:06, 27 November 2016

Collapsed content

Is it customary to just slap a new contributor after 5 minutes because the page was not done perfectly on the first editing? Now I will NOT research and add the actual numbers you would have to plug into the equation and I will leave this to Dave22. Genius. Stamfest (talk) 09:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

We do put those fields there for a reason. Most editors just make a page and leave them incomplete with fields deleted or blank, oftentimes leaving admins with heaps of maintenance work to deal with. I probably *should* have waited for you to finish, but prior experience and me being busy with two simultaneous continuously updating comics led me to treat it like most other incomplete pages. Will wait in the future though, since I know how you edit now. Discussion hidden, as it covers matters outside of the comic. Davidy²²[talk] 10:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
And I added the comment of a (very) initial explanation to the initial version. If you only want immediately perfect content, then just say so at page creation-time. This is totally against all wiki rules I have ever experienced. It is also against basic netiquette to call new contributors names upon their first submission. You might consider to change your attitude if you run or are involved with such a project. OTOH, if this is YOUR project, you are free to treat contributors all the way you want, but do not expect them to add more content if you behave like that. But the good thing is: your reaction shifted my attention back to work. Thanks for that. This won't help the page, though. Bad luck, I guess. Also, I only found out now that it is not possible to delete accounts on a wikimedia wiki... Stamfest (talk) 13:10, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

This comments should be removed from this topic. --Dgbrt (talk) 20:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC) I am not sure if this is relevant but I laughed more reading Stamfest vs Daviddy22 then Randall :D but Dgbrt may have a point of removing it. 173.245.62.83ck

Someone posted that I've been wasting electrons on here. I didn't quite know how to take that, it being true and all. I had the impression that it was the whole point of comics that you waste time on them. Some of us just have too many electrons; obviously.

I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Made a minor addition to the explanation as it relates to the "Buckingham Pi" formalization. This may be a 2nd order pun in the comic.Tardyon (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The units only check out if mileage is given in the form liters/100 km. If you use miles/gallon you end up with units of length^-4.108.162.217.5 22:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


Or, maybe the Plank Energy will decrease... Mountain Hikes (talk) 04:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Why is he breaking from his usual black and white style? The green was a suprise 162.158.39.207 22:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Davy

Retrieved from "https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:687:_Dimensional_Analysis&oldid=131607"