Difference between revisions of "Talk:690: Semicontrolled Demolition"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
Why was mention of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g6V8KZE3GA the firefighter video] removed/reverted and it states again that “there is no video of a plane flying into the north tower”? [[User:Sten|'''S<small>TEN</small>''']] <small>([[User talk:Sten|talk]])</small> 12:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 
Why was mention of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g6V8KZE3GA the firefighter video] removed/reverted and it states again that “there is no video of a plane flying into the north tower”? [[User:Sten|'''S<small>TEN</small>''']] <small>([[User talk:Sten|talk]])</small> 12:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
Wouldn't the most extreme claim be that the entire collapse of the towers was faked? ...as in, they're still there, but with help from Copperfield, They hid it from everyone and created the whole media storm to distract from blah blah blah? [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 20:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:48, 22 October 2014

Sorry haven't posted before so probably doing this in the wrong way. The description says there's no video footage of the first plane, but there's a video taken of firefighters checking man hole covers who caught it. It's on you tube, but I didn't think it was right to post the link.

Edit: on second look I see a link has been put to second impact, so no reason not to post link to first:

[[1]]

86.150.177.79 09:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Bob

Thanks for your input, and you're right! I corrected that in the explanation.
You only "did this in the wrong way" in that you should have edited directly the explanation Face-wink.svg. As on most wikis, the general motto here is Be bold: don't hesitate, just do it!
Thanks again - Cos (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)



Is it just me or is the bottom part of it blanked out for everyone? http://xkcd.com/690/ 203.104.11.12 12:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

It seems as if it is censored. 203.104.11.11 05:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Just you! MR (talk) 02:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)MR

Unless an incomplete shows a specific lack, and I can't find one myself, I will delete the incomplete tag. Anonymous. 00:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

The incomplete tag is back. --Dgbrt (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Why was mention of the firefighter video removed/reverted and it states again that “there is no video of a plane flying into the north tower”? STEN (talk) 12:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Wouldn't the most extreme claim be that the entire collapse of the towers was faked? ...as in, they're still there, but with help from Copperfield, They hid it from everyone and created the whole media storm to distract from blah blah blah? Brettpeirce (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)