Difference between revisions of "Talk:749: Study"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Doesn't work though. Because of the paradox involved. If it is actually a study, it doesn't prove anything if people pick it, because it is not a kidney harvesting scam. And if it is a kidney harvesting scam, it is not a study and thus the result doesn't matter (Except for the people who lack kidneys now) | Doesn't work though. Because of the paradox involved. If it is actually a study, it doesn't prove anything if people pick it, because it is not a kidney harvesting scam. And if it is a kidney harvesting scam, it is not a study and thus the result doesn't matter (Except for the people who lack kidneys now) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Actually, it’s hinted at very strongly that it IS a kidney harvesting scam. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.47.6|172.68.47.6]] 00:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
Yes, I thought it was supposed to be both when I read this one. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.58|108.162.215.58]] 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | Yes, I thought it was supposed to be both when I read this one. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.58|108.162.215.58]] 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:56, 17 November 2017
Perhaps the flyer itself IS the study? If many people picks the number then the result would be that people cannot distinguish the scams. 103.31.5.88 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Doesn't work though. Because of the paradox involved. If it is actually a study, it doesn't prove anything if people pick it, because it is not a kidney harvesting scam. And if it is a kidney harvesting scam, it is not a study and thus the result doesn't matter (Except for the people who lack kidneys now)
Actually, it’s hinted at very strongly that it IS a kidney harvesting scam. 172.68.47.6 00:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I thought it was supposed to be both when I read this one. --108.162.215.58 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
