Difference between revisions of "Talk:750: Book Burning"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(It's not a kindle that is my current bathroom reading-matter...)
 
(Additional long-winded commentary (and IP signing, 'cos I forgot a moment ago)...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"...the Kindle edition is the preferred method of buying a book."?  A bit subjective, really.  Needs more qualifications to make that sound right.  (Except for the aforementioned price, I'm not sure what argument would convince ''me'', however technophilic I am.  I just like all my dead-tree publications, as a glance at my bookshelves and multiple other 'flat' surfaces around the house would confirm.)
 
"...the Kindle edition is the preferred method of buying a book."?  A bit subjective, really.  Needs more qualifications to make that sound right.  (Except for the aforementioned price, I'm not sure what argument would convince ''me'', however technophilic I am.  I just like all my dead-tree publications, as a glance at my bookshelves and multiple other 'flat' surfaces around the house would confirm.)
 +
 +
Oh yeah, and as I forgot to sign the above, can I also add that I'm sure there's also a joke in that in an attempt to eradicate a book, the protesters are actually ''increasing'' the apparent demand for it.  And, unlike a physical volume the misguided destruction of the electronic copy (or at least the medium it exists on) does not deplete any extant stocks.  (In fact, the person who bought and downloaded the eBook can probably re-download the eBook if the downloade mechanism allows that for previously authorised purchases.)  And do it enough and they may even print extra ''physical'' copies.  (Soon to be coming to a remaindered book shop near you, and you, and you as well sir...  Way to go to spread the Word!)  "Epic Fail", anyone? [[Special:Contributions/178.98.192.132|178.98.192.132]] 23:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:44, 4 May 2013

"...the Kindle edition is the preferred method of buying a book."? A bit subjective, really. Needs more qualifications to make that sound right. (Except for the aforementioned price, I'm not sure what argument would convince me, however technophilic I am. I just like all my dead-tree publications, as a glance at my bookshelves and multiple other 'flat' surfaces around the house would confirm.)

Oh yeah, and as I forgot to sign the above, can I also add that I'm sure there's also a joke in that in an attempt to eradicate a book, the protesters are actually increasing the apparent demand for it. And, unlike a physical volume the misguided destruction of the electronic copy (or at least the medium it exists on) does not deplete any extant stocks. (In fact, the person who bought and downloaded the eBook can probably re-download the eBook if the downloade mechanism allows that for previously authorised purchases.) And do it enough and they may even print extra physical copies. (Soon to be coming to a remaindered book shop near you, and you, and you as well sir... Way to go to spread the Word!) "Epic Fail", anyone? 178.98.192.132 23:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)