Editing Talk:822: Guest Week: Jeph Jacques (Questionable Content)

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Am I the only one who noticed that it wasn't the people speaking but their internal monologues untill the second to last panel? No? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.208|162.158.38.208]] 21:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 
Am I the only one who noticed that it wasn't the people speaking but their internal monologues untill the second to last panel? No? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.208|162.158.38.208]] 21:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
βˆ’
: I would have thought it was immediately obvious due to the lack of a connection point (I don't know the proper word for that) to the character and the fact that the first box is fairly standard "love struck but hopeless guy thought process" stuff. Even more so when the girl is reacting to her inner monologue going rogue. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 05:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)