Difference between revisions of "Talk:985: Percentage Points"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Actually, penis size based tax is a brilliant idea. You only have to tax proportional to size, and, now comes the utterly clever part, let the male citizen self-declare his penis size. Voila, tax flow will always be higher than planned. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.230.89|108.162.230.89]] 17:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC) | Actually, penis size based tax is a brilliant idea. You only have to tax proportional to size, and, now comes the utterly clever part, let the male citizen self-declare his penis size. Voila, tax flow will always be higher than planned. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.230.89|108.162.230.89]] 17:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I am glad that under this system my tax burden would be unashamedly miniscule! Which is probably something no one wanted to know! -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.221|162.158.2.221]] 06:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:15, 15 June 2015
Our study shows that only 5% of people know the difference between percentages and percentage points. This is 50% lower than in 2009. --DiEvAl (talk) 06:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Actually, penis size based tax is a brilliant idea. You only have to tax proportional to size, and, now comes the utterly clever part, let the male citizen self-declare his penis size. Voila, tax flow will always be higher than planned. 108.162.230.89 17:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- I am glad that under this system my tax burden would be unashamedly miniscule! Which is probably something no one wanted to know! -Pennpenn 162.158.2.221 06:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
