Editing Template talk:Citation needed

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I added the [Citation needed], as it is generally useful for annotating incomplete descriptions as well as it is funny due to Randall's frequent use of Wikipedia and citations around both in the comics and their use in "what-if". If anybody know how to make the the template have a parameter for tool-tip text, then that could further make the template useful for stating as to what exactly is needed in each use. [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 20:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 
I added the [Citation needed], as it is generally useful for annotating incomplete descriptions as well as it is funny due to Randall's frequent use of Wikipedia and citations around both in the comics and their use in "what-if". If anybody know how to make the the template have a parameter for tool-tip text, then that could further make the template useful for stating as to what exactly is needed in each use. [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 20:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 
:Five years later, an update for those who aren't familiar with this: this template is rarely used today to annotate the (now relatively few) incomplete explanations; if you see it on an explanation, it's probably as a joke after a painfully obvious statement.{{Citation needed}} --[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 04:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 
:Five years later, an update for those who aren't familiar with this: this template is rarely used today to annotate the (now relatively few) incomplete explanations; if you see it on an explanation, it's probably as a joke after a painfully obvious statement.{{Citation needed}} --[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 04:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
βˆ’
::Such jokes are indeed pretty funny more often than not, as long as there aren't more than one or two per typical explanation, IMHO. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.211.52|172.70.211.52]] 02:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: