Difference between revisions of "User talk:162.158.155.26"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: The explanation should be explanatory. Where there's a direct callback to another comic (such as with the bun detector) a reference to that comic might be explanatory, but for the most part they're not.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.26|162.158.155.26]] 09:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC) | : The explanation should be explanatory. Where there's a direct callback to another comic (such as with the bun detector) a reference to that comic might be explanatory, but for the most part they're not.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.26|162.158.155.26]] 09:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah, but for one comic? Seriously?!?!? Referencing other comics happens all the time. We have the categories because THE SAME TOPICS WILL APPEAR MANY TIMES IN THIS WEBCOMIC. THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THE TRIVIA SECTION. Type "Trivia" and press search. Check the first ten results. HOW MANY TRIVIA SECTIONS ARE THERE BECAUSE IT REFERENCES JUST ONE OTHER COMIC?!?!? HUH?!?!?!? ANSWER ME!!!!!!! You are [[1731: Wrong]]. You are not [[White Hat]]. Just stop. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 12:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | :: Yeah, but for one comic? Seriously?!?!? Referencing other comics happens all the time. We have the categories because THE SAME TOPICS WILL APPEAR MANY TIMES IN THIS WEBCOMIC. THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THE TRIVIA SECTION. Type "Trivia" and press search. Check the first ten results. HOW MANY TRIVIA SECTIONS ARE THERE BECAUSE IT REFERENCES JUST ONE OTHER COMIC?!?!? HUH?!?!?!? ANSWER ME!!!!!!! You are [[1731: Wrong]]. You are not [[White Hat]]. Just stop. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 12:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::: Firstly, please lay off all capitals and exclamation / question marks. It doesn't make your point any stronger; it just makes you seem rather aggressive and / or a little deranged. | ||
| + | ::: Secondly, I don't appreciate the hectoring and lecturing tone. If you want to have a reasonable discussion I'm happy to do so, but simply telling people what to do is not acceptable. It's entirely against the spirit of a wiki. | ||
| + | ::: Thirdly, I am not 'wrong', since there is no 'wrong' and 'right' here - it's a matter of opinion. I just happen to have a different opinion to you. | ||
| + | ::: Lastly, in my opinion, if the comic shares a category with another comic, there's no need to reference it directly at all, since it can be found through the category. If there is no shared category, and you just want to note a one-off thematic similarity with another comic, that is clearly trivia, and not part of the explanation, and should go in a 'Trivia' section. I really don't see what the problem is with having a 'Trivia' section with one item in it if there is only one item of trivia to note. It certainly seems better than cluttering up the explanation with trivia, and being inconsistent in where the trivia is found. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.26|162.158.155.26]] 09:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:23, 12 March 2018
Just one thing. Can you please stop putting the trivia thing on explanations just because a comic references one other comic? If it's a recurring theme, then fine, but for ONE COMIC? Just write it at the bottom of each explanation, no need to use trivia. Thanks! Herobrine (talk) 04:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- The explanation should be explanatory. Where there's a direct callback to another comic (such as with the bun detector) a reference to that comic might be explanatory, but for the most part they're not.162.158.155.26 09:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, but for one comic? Seriously?!?!? Referencing other comics happens all the time. We have the categories because THE SAME TOPICS WILL APPEAR MANY TIMES IN THIS WEBCOMIC. THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THE TRIVIA SECTION. Type "Trivia" and press search. Check the first ten results. HOW MANY TRIVIA SECTIONS ARE THERE BECAUSE IT REFERENCES JUST ONE OTHER COMIC?!?!? HUH?!?!?!? ANSWER ME!!!!!!! You are 1731: Wrong. You are not White Hat. Just stop. Herobrine (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, please lay off all capitals and exclamation / question marks. It doesn't make your point any stronger; it just makes you seem rather aggressive and / or a little deranged.
- Secondly, I don't appreciate the hectoring and lecturing tone. If you want to have a reasonable discussion I'm happy to do so, but simply telling people what to do is not acceptable. It's entirely against the spirit of a wiki.
- Thirdly, I am not 'wrong', since there is no 'wrong' and 'right' here - it's a matter of opinion. I just happen to have a different opinion to you.
- Lastly, in my opinion, if the comic shares a category with another comic, there's no need to reference it directly at all, since it can be found through the category. If there is no shared category, and you just want to note a one-off thematic similarity with another comic, that is clearly trivia, and not part of the explanation, and should go in a 'Trivia' section. I really don't see what the problem is with having a 'Trivia' section with one item in it if there is only one item of trivia to note. It certainly seems better than cluttering up the explanation with trivia, and being inconsistent in where the trivia is found. 162.158.155.26 09:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, but for one comic? Seriously?!?!? Referencing other comics happens all the time. We have the categories because THE SAME TOPICS WILL APPEAR MANY TIMES IN THIS WEBCOMIC. THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THE TRIVIA SECTION. Type "Trivia" and press search. Check the first ten results. HOW MANY TRIVIA SECTIONS ARE THERE BECAUSE IT REFERENCES JUST ONE OTHER COMIC?!?!? HUH?!?!?!? ANSWER ME!!!!!!! You are 1731: Wrong. You are not White Hat. Just stop. Herobrine (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
