Main Page
Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 1846 xkcd comics,
and only 34
(2%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!
Latest comic
| Dubious Study |
 Title text: Sounds fine. I looked up the Academy, and it says on their MySpace page that their journal is peer-viewed and downloaded biannually. |
Explanation
This comic alludes to the growing industry in disreputable academic journals, many of whom accept articles of dubious merit for publication without rigorous peer review on payment of a fee. In an attempt to sound legitimate (and thus attract submissions), many such publishers publish journals whose names sound mistakably close to (if not identical to) established titles. Here, the National Academy of Proceedings is a play on the highly regarded academic title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA
The title text implies that this (at present) fictional journal has a dubious online presence in the faded internet site MySpace, where the publishers make claims that may be true but are misleading: "peer-viewed" sounds similar to "peer-reviewed", the community-led process of establishing a paper's scientific integrity prior to publication, but in fact means only that scientists have viewed the content (as Cueball is now). Likewise, some journals might be "published biannually", whereas "downloaded biannually" implies that the journal is read only twice each year. Single articles in high-profile journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences would expect to receive hundreds to thousands of views in their first year of publication. The fictional journal publisher no doubt hopes that an inexperienced scientist may mistake these claims for meaningful statements of authority, and thus submit a paper (and eventually pay a fee for its publication).
The National Academy of Proceedings in fact sets itself apart from certain predatory journals by ensuring that the claims on its website are in fact factually accurate (if phrased to mislead article authors, particularly those with English as an additional language); some journals are openly dishonest on their websites.
Randall also judges academic content based on superficial details in comic 1301: File Extensions, where he focuses on how the information is formatted (in particular if it is in TeX or with the TeX rendering-style of a scientific publication). Similarly, in 906: Advertising Discovery, Randall muses on how we automatically trust anything formatted in Wikipedia style. (This was later proven in a scientific study.)[1] And on a different note, prestigious-sounding but meaningless names also appear in the title text for 1068, where SwiftKey suggests the phrase "Massachusetts Institute of America" to Randall.
- ↑ No it wasn't. But weren't you inclined to believe it just because of the little blue "[1]"?
Transcript
- [Megan is standing behind Cueball who is sitting at a computer desk using a laptop.]
- Megan: Are you sure this study is legit?
- Cueball: Sure, it says it was accepted for publication.
- Megan: Where?
- Cueball: Hmm... The National Academy of Proceedings.
- [Caption below the panel:]
- If something is formatted like a serious scientific paper, it can take me a while to realize it isn't one.
Is this out of date? .
New here?
Last 7 days (Top 10) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to sign up for an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for comics, characters, themes and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd web comic, it should be here.
- If you're new to wiki editing, see how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.
- Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.
- You can browse the comics from List of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.
- There are incomplete explanations listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!
- We sell advertising space to pay for our server costs. To learn more, go here.
Rules
Don't be a jerk.
There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.
If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.
Please only submit material directly related to (and helping everyone better understand) xkcd... and of course only submit material that can legally be posted (and freely edited). Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.
If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.
