Editing 2254: JPEG2000
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
− | {{w|JPEG 2000|JPEG2000}} is a standard for digital image storage created by the Joint Photographic Experts Group from 1997 to 2000 to improve on the original | + | {{incomplete|Created by a BADLY COMPRESSED IMAGE. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} |
− | + | {{w|JPEG 2000|JPEG2000}} is a standard for digital image storage created by the Joint Photographic Experts Group from 1997 to 2000 to improve on the original JPEG standard, published in 1992. As of 2020, it is supported by Photoshop and the Safari browser, but it remains unsupported or poorly supported by other popular software, including Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox browsers, as well as the GIMP (a free and open source image editor). | |
− | The JPEG2000 standard was seen | + | The conventional file name extensions for files using the JPEG2000 standard, .jp2 and .jpx, remain unfamiliar to many users for whom the .jpg extension, denoting the original standard, is well known. |
+ | The JPEG2000 standard was seen an improvement by its creators, supporting many features not included in the original standard, such as multiple resolutions, progressive transmission, a lossless compression option, and alpha channel transparency. The complexity of fully implementing the standard, as well as patent concerns, may have slowed adoption. | ||
− | [[Cueball]] and [[Hairbun]] seem to have some desire for | + | [[Cueball]] and [[Hairbun]] seem to have some desire for JPEG2000 adoption, and may have been involved in its creation. Cueball begins to worry after more than 20 years without much progress but Hairbun is confident that it will eventually prevail, and she cares more about its eventual use than rapid adoption. |
− | The core concept of this comic is that engineers often expect that a superior technology or standard will catch on, though often other factors keep an "inferior" standard dominant. (See various comics referencing [[:Category:Dvorak|Dvorak]] keyboards, as well as the term "[https:// | + | The core concept of this comic is that engineers often expect that a superior technology or standard will catch on, though often other factors keep an "inferior" standard dominant. (See various comics referencing [[:Category:Dvorak|Dvorak]] keyboards, as well as the term "[https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/betamaxed betamaxed].") |
The "we are in this for the long haul" statement might refer to the engineers believing that superior technology will eventually win despite the evidence to the contrary. Its humor comes from the fact that as of the comic publication in 2020, JPEG2000 shows no sign of becoming a widely-used standard. | The "we are in this for the long haul" statement might refer to the engineers believing that superior technology will eventually win despite the evidence to the contrary. Its humor comes from the fact that as of the comic publication in 2020, JPEG2000 shows no sign of becoming a widely-used standard. | ||
− | The title text suggests that [[Randall]] feels bad that the standard hasn't been adopted, perhaps because he empathizes with the engineers who worked hard to develop it or anthropomorphizes the standard itself, which has been ignored by most of the computer-using world. Also he may actually believe it is the better standard that should have been more widely used. DCI, short for {{w|Digital Cinema Initiatives}}, is a collaboration of several major film studios to establish standards for the security and proper display of digital films | + | The title text suggests that [[Randall]] feels bad that the standard hasn't been adopted, perhaps because he empathizes with the engineers who worked hard to develop it or anthropomorphizes the standard itself, which has been ignored by most of the computer-using world. Also he may actually believe it is the better standard that should have been more widely used. DCI, short for {{w|Digital Cinema Initiatives}}, is a collaboration of several major film studios to establish standards for the security and proper display of digital films. |
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
− | :[Cueball and Hairbun are | + | :[Cueball and Hairbun are both at a table, facing each other, both working on their own respective computers.] |
:[Cueball leans back and stops typing. Hairbun continues to type.] | :[Cueball leans back and stops typing. Hairbun continues to type.] | ||
− | :[Cueball | + | :[Cueball looks over at Hairbun.] |
:Cueball: I'm starting to worry that JPEG 2000 isn't catching on as fast as we expected. | :Cueball: I'm starting to worry that JPEG 2000 isn't catching on as fast as we expected. | ||
:Hairbun: Don't worry! We're in this for the long haul. | :Hairbun: Don't worry! We're in this for the long haul. |