|
Please sign your posts with ~~~~
|
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 186: |
Line 186: |
| == Practicality == | | == Practicality == |
| | | |
− | It doesn't seem that this number system actually has that much practicality. Perhaps this can be proven wrong though. {{unsigned ip|172.70.210.201|00:28, 28 January 2024}} | + | It doesn't seem that this number system actually has that much practicality. Perhaps this can be proven wrong though. |
− | :There's already some pointers as to what it's practical at, above...
| |
− | :At the very least, it gives an easier-to-use (from representation to implementation) rearrangement, knowing that you just have to slice off bits of both the sort-key (shifting off a digit at a time, to get N1, N2, N3... etc) and the source-sequence (splicing out the N1th, N2th, N3th... etc). Easier than saying "try the 2835th recombination plan".
| |
− | :But that's just the most trivial use, a mere abstract compared to some more complex topological uses that map 1:1ish against number theory. Use your imagination! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.130|162.158.33.130]] 00:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | == I like how 101 dalmatians can now be 7 dalmatians ==
| |
− | | |
− | [[User:87.bus.rider|87.bus.rider]] ([[User talk:87.bus.rider|talk]]) 11:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
| |