Difference between revisions of "1045: Constraints"
(Created page with "This is comic number 1045. It was posted on April 20,2012. {http://xkcd.com/1045/] File:Constraints.png Image text: [title-text similarly alphabetized] Sorry all, I'm ...") |
(clean up; explainxkcdization of transcript) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{comic | |
| + | | number = 1045 | ||
| + | | date = April 20, 2012 | ||
| + | | title = Constraints | ||
| + | | image = constraints.png | ||
| + | | titletext = [title-text similarly alphabetized] | ||
| + | }} | ||
| − | + | ==Explanation== | |
| + | An {{w|epigram}} is a brief, interesting, usually memorable and sometimes surprising or satirical statement. {{w|Constrained writing}} is an age-old literary phenomenon, where writers impose rules or patterns in their works. ({{w|Haiku}} is a well known example.) | ||
| − | + | Just in case you have been living under a rock for the last several years, {{w|Twitter}} is a short message social network / communication service. All messages (known as tweets) on the service need to be under 140 characters, including private messages. | |
| − | + | All the words spoken by [[Megan]], from "Yeah" to "alphabetization", are in reverse alphabetical order. It both answers [[Cueball]]'s question and exemplifies with an ingenious {{w|self-reference}}, while being short enough to be a valid tweet — hence the "whoa"... | |
| − | + | The title text, "title-text similarly alphabetized", is also backwards-alphabetized and self-referential. | |
| − | + | == Transcript == | |
| − | [[Category:Comics]] | + | :[Cueball sits at his computer desk, motioning toward the screen as Megan stands behind him.] |
| + | :Cueball: I don't get why authors and comedians spend so much energy trying to be clever on Twitter. Couldn't they put that creativity into more books and scripts? — Is there something they ''like'' about the 140-character format? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[Same picture, only Cueball has his arm down.] | ||
| + | :Megan: Yeah. Writers working under tight restrictions produce novel material — like, for example, epigrams employing backward alphabetization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[Cueball remains at his computer desk. Megan is no longer in the frame.] | ||
| + | :Cueball: ...whoa. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{comic discussion}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Comics featuring Megan]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Language]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Social networking]] | ||
Revision as of 17:58, 20 April 2013
| Constraints |
![[title-text similarly alphabetized]](/wiki/index.php/File:constraints.png) Title text: [title-text similarly alphabetized] |
Explanation
An epigram is a brief, interesting, usually memorable and sometimes surprising or satirical statement. Constrained writing is an age-old literary phenomenon, where writers impose rules or patterns in their works. (Haiku is a well known example.)
Just in case you have been living under a rock for the last several years, Twitter is a short message social network / communication service. All messages (known as tweets) on the service need to be under 140 characters, including private messages.
All the words spoken by Megan, from "Yeah" to "alphabetization", are in reverse alphabetical order. It both answers Cueball's question and exemplifies with an ingenious self-reference, while being short enough to be a valid tweet — hence the "whoa"...
The title text, "title-text similarly alphabetized", is also backwards-alphabetized and self-referential.
Transcript
- [Cueball sits at his computer desk, motioning toward the screen as Megan stands behind him.]
- Cueball: I don't get why authors and comedians spend so much energy trying to be clever on Twitter. Couldn't they put that creativity into more books and scripts? — Is there something they like about the 140-character format?
- [Same picture, only Cueball has his arm down.]
- Megan: Yeah. Writers working under tight restrictions produce novel material — like, for example, epigrams employing backward alphabetization.
- [Cueball remains at his computer desk. Megan is no longer in the frame.]
- Cueball: ...whoa.
Add comment 
Create topic (use sparingly) 
Refresh Discussion
Sometimes, seventeen
Syllables are not enough
To just express a Davidy22[talk] 08:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
But sometimes they are!
I rewrote your third line as
"To express a thought." --108.162.216.45 21:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- The first post works exactly the same way with "sixteen" :P --172.69.54.165 14:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Clever...but then it's not a haiku anymore? – Yfmcpxpj (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- To compose a rhyme with seventeen syllables is very diffic.172.71.26.47 12:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Clever...but then it's not a haiku anymore? – Yfmcpxpj (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
"Whoa." is also an example, but one word examples are particularly easy! --DrMath 06:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I can't see the image... what's wrong with it ? --KoundelitchNico (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I just don't find the alphabetization thing to be all that impressive. Everything is written like that. Am I missing something about the very concept? (C comes before O, then jump back to the start, N, back to the start, C, E, P and T.) (I just don't find: I J U back to start S T back to start D O back to start N T back to start F I N back to start D) (Epigrams employing: G N back to start I Y back to start O back to start L P back to start M back to start E back to start S back to start M back to start A R back to start G I P back to start E) 108.162.242.5 02:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Words wholly taken (not letters individually) do come backward alphabetized. --173.245.62.74 12:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Twitter allows up to 280 characters now. The explanation needs some updating. 172.68.253.5 10:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Herobrine (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Add comment
