Difference between revisions of "Talk:346: Diet Coke+Mentos"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 
I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  
: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.
+
: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.{{unsigned|Flewk}}
 +
 
 +
This is just 1337: Part 6. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.107|172.69.70.107]] 15:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
Is the dad in the comic Hairy? If so, should the explanation and transcript be changed? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 19:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:31, 10 October 2024

The title-text reads badly, for me, but indicates that the (traditional) trick as depicted is cool, to the author, along with the non-Newtonian Liquid demonstration. (Although that latter may also have been done to death by virtually every science-for-kids-or-fun TV show that go in for that kind of thing...) 178.98.31.27 03:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't think the "Ta-daa" pose meant that Cueball was expecting his friend's dad to appear out of nowhere instead of the Diet Coke + Mentos eruption. 108.162.216.45 22:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html 108.162.216.89 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog. -- Flewk (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

This is just 1337: Part 6. 172.69.70.107 15:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Is the dad in the comic Hairy? If so, should the explanation and transcript be changed? 42.book.addict (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)