Editing 106: Wright Brothers
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| title = Wright Brothers | | title = Wright Brothers | ||
| image = wright_brothers.png | | image = wright_brothers.png | ||
+ | | imagesize = | ||
| titletext = I'm not sure if this is actually true. | | titletext = I'm not sure if this is actually true. | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
− | + | Onward to the comic. [[Cueball]] states by switching sides during a debate (which, maybe, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Brothers Wright Brothers] did) you can reach a more balanced decision. [[Megan]] argues that this can be true for business decisions, but not for relational decisions. I tend to believe Megan, because women have entirely different aspects about these kinds of decisions from men. But, quoting frame 4, she is willing to give it a try. Then, Cueball denies his own case and thus disproving his own statement by locking the possibility. Which is superior in his man-being, but bad for the whole relationship. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | The {{w|Wright brothers}} are Orville and Wilbur Wright who are credited with the invention of the {{w|airplane}} and who are credited with the first "controlled, powered and sustained heavier-than-air human flight" in 1903, although it is not very important to know this for the comic to make sense, it is notable that they are two brothers who worked together resulting in a great technological breakthrough. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | [[Cueball]]] suggests to [[Megan]] that the Wright Brothers would sometimes argue each other's point during debates in order to "encourage a more balanced debate" – presumably so both brothers would explore all of the arguments on both sides. | |
+ | |||
+ | Megan is initially against the idea of treating emotionally-charged personal issues as if they were academic debates would not work. However, Cueball argues that it would force each person to consider the other's point of view. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, when Megan then reconsiders, accepts his argument and appears to agree that they should try it, Cueball abruptly switches his position to thinking that it's a terrible idea. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The joke is that Megan agrees with him (he has convinced her that he is right), which should end the argument. However, he then employs his Wright Brothers suggestion and takes her (initial) position that the idea was bad. Thus, the two have switched their arguments and are no closer to ending the argument; except that Megan seems to have legitimately agreed, while Cueball appears to have done so arbitrarily to try out the Wright Brothers principle. | ||
− | + | {{Comic discussion}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | {{ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |