Difference between revisions of "106: Wright Brothers"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{ComicHeader|105|April 11, 2006}} File:Wright_brothers.png == Image Text == I'm not sure if this is actually true. == Description == Okaaay. First off. If Randall ...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComicHeader|105|April 11, 2006}}
+
{{ComicHeader|106|April 11, 2006}}
  
 
[[File:Wright_brothers.png]]
 
[[File:Wright_brothers.png]]
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Onward to the comic. [[Cueball]] states by switching sides during a debate (which, maybe, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Brothers Wright Brothers] did) you can reach a more balanced decision. [[Megan]] argues that this can be true for business decisions, but not for relational decisions. I tend to believe Megan, because women have entirely different aspects about these kinds of decisions from men. But, quoting frame 4, she is willing to give it a try. Then, Cueball denies his own case and thus disproving his own statement by locking the possibility. Which is superior in his man-being, but bad for the whole relationship.
 
Onward to the comic. [[Cueball]] states by switching sides during a debate (which, maybe, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Brothers Wright Brothers] did) you can reach a more balanced decision. [[Megan]] argues that this can be true for business decisions, but not for relational decisions. I tend to believe Megan, because women have entirely different aspects about these kinds of decisions from men. But, quoting frame 4, she is willing to give it a try. Then, Cueball denies his own case and thus disproving his own statement by locking the possibility. Which is superior in his man-being, but bad for the whole relationship.
  
[[Category:Comics|0105]]
+
[[Category:Comics|0106]]

Revision as of 13:16, 3 August 2012

Template:ComicHeader

wright brothers.png

Image Text

I'm not sure if this is actually true.

Description

Okaaay. First off. If Randall isn't sure anything is true, it needs verification. You can give that by supporting the theorem stated (Wright Brothers periodically switching sides).

Onward to the comic. Cueball states by switching sides during a debate (which, maybe, the Wright Brothers did) you can reach a more balanced decision. Megan argues that this can be true for business decisions, but not for relational decisions. I tend to believe Megan, because women have entirely different aspects about these kinds of decisions from men. But, quoting frame 4, she is willing to give it a try. Then, Cueball denies his own case and thus disproving his own statement by locking the possibility. Which is superior in his man-being, but bad for the whole relationship.