Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
In this comic, Cueball is arguing on the internet via his phone with someone elsewhere on their laptop. They are arguing about a conspiracy theory, however, it is unclear which one. Since these arguments are interminable, Cueball "wins" the argument by going down a waterslide (carrying his phone, which doesn't seem like a great idea since the phone could get very wet on one of those slides and stop functioning). In doing so, he willfully abandons trying to change the other party's mind to have fun instead, while the other party is still at their computer, attempting to win an internet argument.
The point of the comic is that abandoning the argument is more satisfying and fun than continuing, and by doing something more fun, Cueball is the winner despite not technically winning the argument.
- Cueball: I can't believe you're so wrong. I'm backed by Snopes, Wikipedia, and a half-dozen journals. You're citing .net pages with black backgrounds and like 20 fonts each.
- Man: It's sad how you buy into the official story so unquestioningly. Guess some people prefer to stay asleep.
- Cueball: Watch closely - I'm about to win this argument.
- Man: responding electronically: how?
- Cueball: By going down a waterslide.
- [The person is sitting at the very top of a waterslide preparing to descend]
- Man: So? what does that prove?
- Cueball: Wheeee..
- Man: You didn't win the argument!
- Cueball: ...eeee
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
I also think it could be a joke on the "Guess some people prefer to stay asleep." line ? 18.104.22.168 18:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Conspiracy theories are typically considered (especially by non-conspiracy-theorists) to make one sleepless/have nightmares, due to their often frightening nature.22.214.171.124 19:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I still don't understand the title text. I would think that the side that thinks "anyone who's in power has any plan at all" would be the conspiracy theorists, but how is that comforting? 126.96.36.199 14:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think he wants to say that our political leaders don't really seem to overlook our world's machinery (as conspiracy theorists assume), and that he finds this rather frightening. --Kronf (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, the opposite. The conspiracy theorists believe there is a plan. We suspect the opposite because we are rational and see no good evidence. Nonceexkcd (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's what I tried to say. --Kronf (talk) 16:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think of it as a joke, based around the stereotype of politicians having either terrible plans/policies or none at all. He finds it more comforting for them to have any plan, even if it is a conspiracy. It could be thought of as "at least they have a plan and control, instead of no plan and chaos". 188.8.131.52 09:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
To clarify, he finds the fact that if conspiracy theorists are right, somebody is ruling the world and by extension, looking over it and making sure it doesn't fall apart on them, as opposed to it being a chaotic unsupervised mess. 184.108.40.206 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Really? Combs Hair Down? Surely there's a better name for this person... 220.127.116.11 07:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Conspiracy Theorist? -Pennpenn 18.104.22.168 04:10, 9 July 2015 (UTC)