Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
In this comic, Cueball is arguing on the internet via his phone with someone else on their laptop. They appear to be arguing about some conspiracy theory. Since these arguments are interminable, Cueball "wins" the argument by going down a waterslide (carrying his phone, which doesn't seem like a great idea since the phone could get wet). In doing so, he willfully abandons trying to change the other party's mind to go have fun instead, while the other guy is still at their computer, trying to win an Internet argument.
The point here is that sometimes the battle isn't worth fighting. Cueball didn't really win the debate, but he's certainly having a lot more fun.
- Cueball: I can't believe you're so wrong. I'm backed by Snopes, Wikipedia, and a half-dozen journals. You're citing .net pages with black backgrounds and like 20 fonts each.
- Man: It's sad how you buy into the official story so unquestioningly. Guess some people prefer to stay asleep.
- Cueball: Watch closely - I'm about to win this argument.
- Man: responding electronically: how?
- Cueball: By going down a waterslide.
- [The person is sitting at the very top of a waterslide preparing to descend]
- Man: So? what does that prove?
- Cueball: Wheeee..
- Man: You didn't win the argument!
- Cueball: ...eeee
add a comment! ⋅ refresh comments!
I also think it could be a joke on the "Guess some people prefer to stay asleep." line ? 126.96.36.199 18:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
I still don't understand the title text. I would think that the side that thinks "anyone who's in power has any plan at all" would be the conspiracy theorists, but how is that comforting? 188.8.131.52 14:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think he wants to say that our political leaders don't really seem to overlook our world's machinery (as conspiracy theorists assume), and that he finds this rather frightening. --Kronf (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, the opposite. The conspiracy theorists believe there is a plan. We suspect the opposite because we are rational and see no good evidence. Nonceexkcd (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's what I tried to say. --Kronf (talk) 16:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I think of it as a joke, based around the stereotype of politicians having either terrible plans/policies or none at all. He finds it more comforting for them to have any plan, even if it is a conspiracy. It could be thought of as "at least they have a plan and control, instead of no plan and chaos". 184.108.40.206 09:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
To clarify, he finds the fact that if conspiracy theorists are right, somebody is ruling the world and by extension, looking over it and making sure it doesn't fall apart on them, as opposed to it being a chaotic unsupervised mess. 220.127.116.11 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Really? Combs Hair Down? Surely there's a better name for this person... 18.104.22.168 07:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Conspiracy Theorist? -Pennpenn 22.214.171.124 04:10, 9 July 2015 (UTC)