Editing 1124: Law of Drama
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
− | The comic comments on how often people who label themselves as an innocent party in a debate are often far from it. Essentially, [[Randall]] seems to be graphically stating that people who claim to hate and want to avoid drama are invariably associated with it. Since [[552: Correlation|correlation does not imply causation]], it might be a leap — at least scientifically speaking — to actually surmise that they're the cause of it. | + | The comic comments on how often people who label themselves as an innocent party in a debate are often far from it. Essentially, [[Randall]] seems to be graphically stating that people who claim to hate and want to avoid drama are invariably associated with it. Since [[552: Correlation|correlation does not imply causation]], it might be a leap — at least scientifically speaking — to actually surmise that they're the cause of it. |
The title text suggests that the person's attitude towards drama is wrong. Supposing that "'Drama' is just 'people being upset'", then ignoring drama is a very bad way to deal with it. By ignoring people's problems, you certainly won't be able to help them, and are at risk of causing further problems through ignorance. | The title text suggests that the person's attitude towards drama is wrong. Supposing that "'Drama' is just 'people being upset'", then ignoring drama is a very bad way to deal with it. By ignoring people's problems, you certainly won't be able to help them, and are at risk of causing further problems through ignorance. |