1681: Laser Products
| Laser Products |
 Title text: ERRORS: HAIR JAM. COLOR-SAFE CONDITIONER CARTRIDGE RUNNING LOW. LEGAL-SIZE HAIR TRAY EMPTY, USING LETTER-SIZE HAIR ONLY. |
Explanation
This comic takes three laser-based technologies - laser eye surgery, laserjet printers, and laser hair removal - and conflates them, with humorous results. These are illustrated through reviews by users of the resulting combinations. For the original combinations, the reviews are highly positive. For the new combinations, most are negative, because most of these new "technologies" are ill-conceived and possibly harmful.
Laser eye surgery gets a positive review, since it has successfully corrected the reviewer's vision, no longer requiring them to use glasses. However, laser eye removal would be very painful, and thus the review is negative, stating that the reviewer had read the description incorrectly, likely believing it to be one of the real combinations on the chart. Additionally, there is an absurdist joke of the reviewer expressing the pain from the procedure in their review as if they were responding immediately after the procedure; an actual person suffering such an experience would likely require a great deal of time, and adaptive equipment, before they could provide an online review, and even if they didn't, people do not typically type out their screams of pain. However, if they were using a voice-to-text system for their reviews, it would pick up their screams of pain as well as the review. (This is not the first time laser eye removal has been mentioned, see the lower right part in the 1619: Watson Medical Algorithm chart.) Laser eye printer refers to printing on (or possibly of) an eyeball, which only prompts a disgusted "Eww" response.
Laser jet surgery makes the reviewer nervous, as performing maintenance on a jet with lasers is potentially dangerous and could easily be done incorrectly[citation needed]. Alternatively, laser jet surgery could mean laser surgery done on a human from a jet aircraft with a laser mounted to it (unspecified whether the human being operated on is aboard that aircraft as well, another aircraft, or on land: in any case, not a safe idea). Or possibly surgery using a jet made of lasers, which is even worse and would likely cause the entire body to be disintegrated.[citation needed] The ambiguity of the phrase may contribute to the person's concern. Laser jet removal implies the destruction of jets with lasers, which works, but angers the Federal Aviation Administration, and probably resulted in legal consequences for the reviewer. Laserjet printing gets a positive review, as it is legitimate printing technology that works well for the reviewer.
The Laser Jet Removal may refer to the real FAA concern of the many incidents of people using laser pointers against aircraft.
Laser hair surgery is rated neutrally, with the reviewer pointing out that they consider the phrase to be bizarre and obfuscating -- for the user, it amounted to little more than a normal haircut -- and they note that the using a laser to cut hair results in a smell of burning hair. Laser hair removal is reviewed well, as it is a real process that effectively removes unwanted hair. Laser hair printer is negatively reviewed for being disgusting, the printer jamming, and the machine being unable to stop printing the hair.
The title text expands on the laser hair printer from the last entry, displaying standard printer error messages, replacing "paper" with "hair". It also replaces "ink" with "color-safe conditioner".
Laser eye surgery
LASIK, one of the more common laser eye surgeries, works by cutting open the cornea and ablating a small amount of the lens. Lasers are used for both steps. This, or equivalent, is the referenced surgery. There are other laser eye surgeries for various other conditions besides near- and far-sightedness.
Laserjet printing
LaserJet is a brand name used by Hewlett Packard (HP) for its line of laser printers.
Laser printing is an electrostatic digital printing process. It produces high-quality text and graphics (and moderate-quality photographs) by repeatedly passing a laser beam back and forth over a negatively charged cylinder called a "drum" to define a differentially-charged image. The drum then selectively collects electrically charged powdered ink (toner), and transfers the image to paper, which is then heated in order to permanently fuse the text and/or imagery. As with digital photocopiers and multifunction/all-in-one inkjet printers, laser printers employ a xerographic printing process. However, laser printing differs from analog photocopiers in that the image is produced by the direct scanning of the medium across the printer's photoreceptor. This enables laser printing to copy images more quickly than most photocopiers.
Laser hair removal
Laser hair removal is the process of removing unwanted hair by means of exposure to pulses of laser light that destroy the hair follicle. It had been performed experimentally for about twenty years before becoming commercially available in the mid-1990s. One of the first published articles describing laser hair removal was authored by the group at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1998.The efficacy of laser hair removal is now generally accepted in the dermatology community,[citation needed] and laser hair removal is widely practiced in clinics, and even in homes using devices designed and priced for consumer self-treatment. Many reviews of laser hair removal methods, safety, and efficacy have been published in the dermatology literature.
Lastly, as an aside, "Laser Jet Removal" actually exists as a military weapon system. Although it's primarily meant to be used against jet missiles not jet planes (as the FAA quip suggests).
Transcript
- [Heading above the table:]
- Online Reviews of Laser Products
- [A three by three table with one word to the far left, from which three lines split out and goes to three words just left of each of the three rows. Above each column is three other words. Below in the table are nine reviews with star rating on a five star scale. The actual rating is indicated with black stars and also use half filled stars in the rating system. The ratings are written in the table in square brackets.]
...surgery ...removal ...printer Laser eye... [4 1/2 stars]
"I don't need
glasses anymore!"
[1/2 star]
"Aaaaaaa! Misread
the description!
Aaaaaaaaaaaa!!"[1 star]
"Eww."
jet... [1 1/2 stars]
"Too nervous
to try it."
[2 1/2 stars]
"Effective, but
the FAA got
really mad."[4 stars]
"Prints great!"
hair... [2 1/2 stars]
"Confusing term
for haircut.
Burning smell."[4 stars]
"Great results!"
[1/2 star]
"Disgusting, won't
turn off, jams
constantly."
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ 
refresh comments!Discussion
Laser jet surgery might be a reference to rocket surgery? 141.101.80.25 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
What is a laser eye printer and why is it eww ? 173.245.54.29 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- It prints eyes... that should be self explanatory. 141.101.98.42 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Could also mean printing on the eye with a laser. Sounds possible but odd. 173.245.54.28 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Laser eye printer sounds like the type of thing edgy people want. Imagine printing a pentagram on your pupil or sclera 162.158.26.140 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
The first laser was fired 56 years ago, on 16 May 1960 by Theodore Harold Maiman. Maybe this comic is a reference? 188.114.109.103 15:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
You don't need to describe how any of these work in detail, just provide a quick description and link them to wikipedia. Lackadaisical (talk) 16:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Laserjet is a trademarked brand of printers from HP. Does it have any meaning beyond the trademark. I know "Inkjet" is a type of printer that sprays a jet of ink onto the paper, but normally one would just say "laser printer" if one isn't referring to an Epson model Zeimusu (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
"Laser-mounted jet aircraft"... surely you meant jet aircraft-mounted laser? I'll leave this how it is for a day or two in case I'm missing something. Xseo (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I found this comic to be funnier than it was intended to be, especially "laser jet removal" because I'm an astronomy nerd and we (at least everyone I've stargazed with) always talk about how we shouldn't point the laser pointers at the bright, moving, blinking stars because that would be very bad and turn it into a shooting star.
On a side note, I wonder if Arctic Blues are powerful enough to be spotted by people on the ISS, and theoretically how much power and how focused a laser would have to be to blind someone in the cupola. Also how powerful it would need to be to burn a hole through its outside, assuming you had an ultra stable tracking mount. I need to know by Tuesday.
(Hi NSA, I know I'm on your watchlists for being the atheistic daughter of "Hassan" Muslim immigrants, a communist, and a tinkerer of really dangerous science, but this is xkcd and I am sure this is the least sketchy "what if" that has ever been asked on this site.) International Space Station (talk) 10:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- The first part of that question was tested in 2012. http://www.universetoday.com/93987/amateur-astronomers-flash-the-space-station/. The article mentions that the 800 million lumen (dubious) searchlights came in brighter than magnitude 0 but the 1 MW blue laser was "also visible". From the picture it looks to be about magnitude 2 or 3. To match the sun's brightness (for blinding purposes) you'd need to get that up to about -26.5. Making up a 29 magnitude difference means you'd need to make your laser about 400 billion times brighter, or about 400 petawatts. You can probably bring that power draw down significantly by focusing the beam more, but since the Earth's power consumption is only about 2.5 petawatts (per Randall), you're already pretty far outside the realm of possibility. 108.162.237.220 13:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- When I say blind, I mean "blind" in the same sense of "I accidentally flashed my green laser pointer in my eye via my mirror." So that would be just 35mW at 20ft. Couldn't you develop an ultra-focused laser (atmospheric distortion aside) that was able to focus all that energy onto an astronaut's eye from the ground? International Space Station (talk) 05:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Laser guide stars are impressively bright at a quarter of the distance to your orbit. 5 kW laser brooms have been proposed for laser satellite removal. The main problem with laser astronaut surgery is probably your huge relative velocity; they won't be visible through your windows long enough to be targeted. You might be more successful powering a laser cannon from your solar array and trying to strike Baikonur. .42 (talk) 06:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
An inkjet printer is very definitely not xerographic printing, which refers to a dry printing process. A better term would be "raster" rather than "xerographic" although the former still does not imply converting the image to pixels, which appears to be the point the sentence is trying to make. At least "raster" means the image is converted to scan lines...108.162.241.123 02:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I think that it means that you are strapping jets oflasers to your eyeballs and using them to peform surgery.108.162.221.97 21:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
"PC LOAD HAIR"? What the fuck does that mean? Jevicci (talk) 22:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Based on PC LOAD LETTER, an error message in some old printers. 162.158.92.58 15:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I think Laser Eyes Printer could refer to current technology of 3D printing, which is processes used to create a three-dimensional object in which material is joined or solidified under computer control to create an object, with material being added together (such as liquid molecules or powder grains being fused together). Albeit that it uses laser to print out the 3D representation of the eyes.Boeing-787lover 07:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
