Editing 2292: Thermometer
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Deliberately lacking Fahrenheit is a jab against the {{w|Imperial system of units}}, and against the similar but distinct system of {{w|United States customary units}}. Although Imperial units and local traditional units are still used for various limited purposes (and/or by older generations) in different countries, most of the world has switched to using the metric system for most purposes going forward, with the US being relatively unusual in the extent to which it still routinely defaults to the US customary units in daily life. Many proponents of the metric system have long pushed for the US to change over, arguing that Imperial and US customary units (and degrees Fahrenheit, specifically) are archaic and obsolete. [[Randall]] has dealt with this conflict in [[1643|other strips]]; as a physics major, he's partial to the metric system, and finds it frustrating to maintain multiple different scales (which is the basis of the conflict in this strip). On the other hand, he recognizes certain intuitive advantages to Imperial and US customary measurements, and recognizes that the forces of social inertia in US society make change difficult. | Deliberately lacking Fahrenheit is a jab against the {{w|Imperial system of units}}, and against the similar but distinct system of {{w|United States customary units}}. Although Imperial units and local traditional units are still used for various limited purposes (and/or by older generations) in different countries, most of the world has switched to using the metric system for most purposes going forward, with the US being relatively unusual in the extent to which it still routinely defaults to the US customary units in daily life. Many proponents of the metric system have long pushed for the US to change over, arguing that Imperial and US customary units (and degrees Fahrenheit, specifically) are archaic and obsolete. [[Randall]] has dealt with this conflict in [[1643|other strips]]; as a physics major, he's partial to the metric system, and finds it frustrating to maintain multiple different scales (which is the basis of the conflict in this strip). On the other hand, he recognizes certain intuitive advantages to Imperial and US customary measurements, and recognizes that the forces of social inertia in US society make change difficult. | ||
− | The title text references an archaic temperature unit, {{w|Rømer scale|Rømer}}, first proposed in 1701. It is the common ancestor of both the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales, | + | The title text references an archaic temperature unit, {{w|Rømer scale|Rømer}}, first proposed in 1701. It is the common ancestor of both the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales, and sets the freezing point of water to 7.5 degrees whilst defining the boiling point of water to be 60 degrees. Unlike the other measurements mentioned in this strip, the Rømer scale is no longer used in any context, and only people interested in the history of temperature scales have any idea that it even exists. This is the ultimate form of obscure and outdated temperature measurements. |
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== |