961: Eternal Flame

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 00:39, 10 April 2014 by Waldir (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Eternal Flame
There's always the hope that if you sit and watch for long enough, the beachball will vanish and the thing it interrupted will return.
Title text: There's always the hope that if you sit and watch for long enough, the beachball will vanish and the thing it interrupted will return.

[edit] Explanation

Steve Jobs died on October 5, 2011, the day before this comic was posted. He was the CEO and one of the founders of Apple, Inc. He was the head of Apple for the introduction of OS X, the operating system used on all modern Macintoshes. For OS X, when a program ties up enough system resources, an animated cursor, affectionately referred to as "the beachball," appears and spins, seemingly endlessly.

The title text refers to the fact that on the Mac, the application sometimes recovers and the system comes back; other times, however, the damage is irrevocable, a Kernel Panic happens and the system needs a restart.

It could be also inspired by the John F. Kennedy Eternal Flame.

[edit] Transcript

[Two people before a memorial with an eternally spinning wait cursor. They contemplate silently on an influential life. Goodbye, Steve.]

[edit] Trivia

  • This comic was released the day after Steve Jobs died - a Thursday. It replaced the Friday comic. The next comic was not released until Monday.
comment.png add a comment!

Discussion

Ugh, I hate it when people attribute everything the the technology to Steve Jobs. Apple spends pebbles on R&D, polishes up the work of other countries and they get labelled as inventors and heroes. Incredibly frustrating for the rest of us in the technology industry. Davidy²²[talk] 08:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

I don't think Apple would polish up the work of other countries. InAndOutLand (talk) 01:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
The way I see it, Apple's innovation is in their UI. The iPod wasn't the first portable digital music player, and the iPhone wasn't the first smartphone, but they were the first in their respective classes to have an intuitive interface that could easily be understood by someone with no technology background. Marketing is everything in the tech industry, and a product will fail if it can't convince the market that it's the better choice, even if it's absolutely better from a technical standpoint. Curtmack (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
First of all, nothing in this comic attributes "everything in the technology industry" to Steve. Secondly, Apple spends more on R&D than most other companies – it's one of the reasons the markup is so high on Apple's products. Thirdly, if those "other companies" were just as good at design and execution as Apple, as you seem to believe, there would be nothing stopping them from achieving the same success as Apple. So what stopped Dell from releasing the iPhone and upsetting the mobile industry? What stopped HP from developing an online music store and totally upsetting the music industry? Either you're going to have to argue that everyone except Apple is just incredibly, incredibly unlucky, or you have to admit that there is something that Apple does that those companies don't. What that differentiating thing may be is open for debate, sure, but to say that everything they do is just a polish of some other company's work is simply ignorant. 71.201.53.130 17:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Apple got lucky early on, and managed to get a fanbase, which they have basically brainwashed into thinking that Apple Products are automatically better than anything else. Secondly, I assume that it was not the comic itseld Davidy22 was referring to, but rather the explanation, which has since been changed. 74.214.147.188 23:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Brainwashed? The Apple II and the Macintosh were not the first in their ideas, but they were revolutionary computers. 112.209.87.11 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
"pebbles on R&D"? I wish I had pebbles... Apple spends BILLIONS of US dollars every year on R&D ($3.3B in 2012, $4.4B in 2013). Check their Form-K filings with the SEC if you don't believe me. Some other tech companies spend more, but they also have a much larger product line than Apple's so that is to be expected.108.162.216.100 14:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools

It seems you are using noscript, which is stopping our project wonderful ads from working. Explain xkcd uses ads to pay for bandwidth, and we manually approve all our advertisers, and our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs. If you found this site helpful, please consider whitelisting us.

Want to advertise with us, or donate to us with Paypal or Bitcoin?