Difference between revisions of "Talk:1048: Emotion"
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::I agree. Even if it was not meant to contain joke, I don't think it is important to point out, there are several xkcd strips that aren't meant to be funny and they don't all note it in the explanations here. [[User:Jaalenja|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja|talk]]) | ::I agree. Even if it was not meant to contain joke, I don't think it is important to point out, there are several xkcd strips that aren't meant to be funny and they don't all note it in the explanations here. [[User:Jaalenja|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja|talk]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Okay, I edited it a little bit. How does that look? [[User:SuperSupermario24|Just some random derp]] ([[User talk:SuperSupermario24|talk]]) 22:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:51, 27 April 2015
Damn. Well, she's still going strong. I suppose that's a good thing. Davidy22[talk] 13:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I was surprised nobody noted the big increase in romance around early 2009 -- presumably when Randall met his future wife? 108.162.212.30 11:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I am concerned about the ending of Joss Whedon's influence. Didn't Randall like the Avengers at all? I will grant you that Nathon Fillion has not been in those movies, but there should be some response!--108.162.219.18 14:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
"This comic does not show any joke." Hm... I thought putting "people being wrong on the internet" as a major source of emotions was meant to be a joke...? I know this is a mostly serious comic, but saying that it doesn't have any jokes at all seems a bit inaccurate... Not sure though, so I'll just leave it. Just some random derp (talk) 02:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, I edited it a little bit. How does that look? Just some random derp (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)