Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| This page has to explain the ambiguous meanings of the words hipster/hipsters/hipsterdom. Even web dictionaries are often wrong on this. | | This page has to explain the ambiguous meanings of the words hipster/hipsters/hipsterdom. Even web dictionaries are often wrong on this. |
| First for "hipster" we have this subcultures {{w|Hipster (contemporary subculture)}} and {{w|Hipster (1940s subculture)}}. But it's also this: {{w|Low-rise (fashion)}} witch may be refer to that tedious navel-gazing people. "Hipsterdom" is related to that subculture and according to this site [[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hipsterdom Hipsterdom]] it is a hierarchy within the subculture of hipsters.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 18:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC) | | First for "hipster" we have this subcultures {{w|Hipster (contemporary subculture)}} and {{w|Hipster (1940s subculture)}}. But it's also this: {{w|Low-rise (fashion)}} witch may be refer to that tedious navel-gazing people. "Hipsterdom" is related to that subculture and according to this site [[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hipsterdom Hipsterdom]] it is a hierarchy within the subculture of hipsters.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 18:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC) |
− |
| |
− | Is Randall actually complaining/judging as opposed to observing and sharing results? Graphing of the situation can arguably exacerbate any situation by virtue of raising attention to something, but that doesn't mean those graphs are giving any opinion. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87|76.106.251.87]] 23:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters. http://dustinland.com/dlands/dland.hipster.jpg {{unsigned|93.41.186.46|09:05, 6 June 2013}}
| |
− |
| |
− | I'm just going to point out that hipsters were complaining about hipsters back in the 1930's. The naval gazing metacomplaints were only temporarily halted by World War II. {{unsigned|82.153.14.210|14:55, 6 June 2013}}
| |
− |
| |
− | In uncyclopedia there were Holocaust[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Holocaust], Holocaust denial[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Holocaust_denial], Holocaust denial denial, Holocaust denial denial denial till Holocaust denial^6.--[[User:Grass|Grass]] ([[User talk:Grass|talk]]) 02:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
| |