Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | | |
| Screensavers are more of a security tool now, as they can be set up to require login credentials to resume work. [[User:Gardnertoo|Gardnertoo]] ([[User talk:Gardnertoo|talk]]) 16:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC) | | Screensavers are more of a security tool now, as they can be set up to require login credentials to resume work. [[User:Gardnertoo|Gardnertoo]] ([[User talk:Gardnertoo|talk]]) 16:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC) |
− |
| |
− | What is that truncated word supposed to be after salad? Salad compost? Salad component? You don't win friends with salad compared to a BBBQ? [[Special:Contributions/128.49.161.70|128.49.161.70]] 20:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | I think it's "computers," beginning the next reassuring expression. [[Special:Contributions/69.245.155.187|69.245.155.187]] 01:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | It’s shurely no coincidence that megan makes a python script: http://xkcd.com/353/ --[[Special:Contributions/84.191.162.233|84.191.162.233]] 09:15, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | Haha. https://www.khanacademy.org/cs/sentence-generator/2038602492 [[Special:Contributions/203.188.230.100|203.188.230.100]] 10:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | http://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Shih-Chieh+Huang {{unsigned ip|82.15.102.182}}
| |
− |
| |
− | Actually, the screen saver being obsolete is not true. I have an LCD monitor here that has a faint, but still distinctly visible Windows XP taskbar with a very blurry clock when displaying black. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_persistence
| |
− | [[User:Lennartgoosens|Lennartgoosens]] ([[User talk:Lennartgoosens|talk]]) 22:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
| |
− | :You can simply set a timeout for the display to turn off to avoid this (the same timeout as you would set for a screensaver). I have clarified that in the explanation. [[User:Sten|'''S<small>TEN</small>''']] <small>([[User talk:Sten|talk]])</small> 01:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | The screensaver is not obsolete; the years-old Dell that has been running it (and possibly being amused by it) is obsolete. No other reading of the title text can be justified. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.58|108.162.219.58]] 09:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | I don't see why computers can "never" do certain things. I mean, humans can do those things, so its just a sensory inputs and processing, and the structure that gets built to understand it. The first step though, is to figure out why we do those things so we can replicate it elsewhere. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.205|108.162.249.205]] 03:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | :You're assuming that everything humans do is algorithmic. Every computer scientist agrees with you, and almost every neurologist, and the vast majority of cognitive scientists. But a few physicists and a lot of philosophers disagree. If human minds are actually doing something that requires quantum computing (as Penrose believes), or that's impossible even with quantum computing (as Searle claims not to believe but keeps ending up arguing for), then... Well, then we're wrong about the last century or so of knowledge, and we've got bigger problems than AI anyway.... [[Special:Contributions/199.27.130.180|199.27.130.180]] 09:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | ::I'm going to side more with computer experts, neurologists, and cognitive experts over physicists and philosophers on the subject of computer consciousness, cognition, and capacity (especially given my opinion that most philosophy is self-indulgent wankery by people with nothing better to do). Also I didn't preclude quantum computing from the options here. If human neurological functions require quantum level computing, then that's what it'll take. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 23:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | :AlphaGo has us beat. It defeated 2-dan Fan Hui in October 2015 and 9-dan Lee Sedol in March 2016. {{unsigned ip|162.158.83.162}}
| |