Editing Talk:1266: Halting Problem
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
I think that the title text is a direct reference to Karl Popper's falsifiability argument, since this is one of the most common example of a non-falsifiable statement. [[User:Bonob|Bonob]] ([[User talk:Bonob|talk]]) 19:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC) | I think that the title text is a direct reference to Karl Popper's falsifiability argument, since this is one of the most common example of a non-falsifiable statement. [[User:Bonob|Bonob]] ([[User talk:Bonob|talk]]) 19:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Popper claimed that such things are outside the realms of science, correct? The undecidability of this question has been used to falsify other intended scientific proofs. Therefore, it is surely within the realms of science. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.58|108.162.219.58]] 23:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | :Popper claimed that such things are outside the realms of science, correct? The undecidability of this question has been used to falsify other intended scientific proofs. Therefore, it is surely within the realms of science. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.58|108.162.219.58]] 23:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |