Difference between revisions of "Talk:1296: Git Commit"
(comment about time flow direction) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note that in most (all?) graphical history viewers for Git time flows from bottom up, i.e. newest commits are on top, not on bottom as in this comics --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 07:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC) | Note that in most (all?) graphical history viewers for Git time flows from bottom up, i.e. newest commits are on top, not on bottom as in this comics --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 07:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can relate. While I start with reasonable commit messages every day, working on one feature often results in | ||
| + | :(good description of feature) | ||
| + | :bugfixes for (description of feature) | ||
| + | :another bugfix | ||
| + | :damn | ||
| + | :should work now | ||
| + | :grrr | ||
| + | :typo | ||
| + | :I hate (some used library) | ||
| + | when I either need commit to deploy or I'm so sure it will work I don't test it deeply enough. If I would be using git, these could be merged, but I'm not. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 27 November 2013
Note that in most (all?) graphical history viewers for Git time flows from bottom up, i.e. newest commits are on top, not on bottom as in this comics --JakubNarebski (talk) 07:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I can relate. While I start with reasonable commit messages every day, working on one feature often results in
- (good description of feature)
- bugfixes for (description of feature)
- another bugfix
- damn
- should work now
- grrr
- typo
- I hate (some used library)
when I either need commit to deploy or I'm so sure it will work I don't test it deeply enough. If I would be using git, these could be merged, but I'm not. -- Hkmaly (talk) 10:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
