| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | | | |
| | [http://xkcd.com/1071/ This] is very similar. It was of June 2012, so quite a bit has been discovered since then. By [http://kepler.nasa.gov/ Kepler], I think? --[[User:Irino.|Irino.]] ([[User talk:Irino.|talk]]) 17:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | | [http://xkcd.com/1071/ This] is very similar. It was of June 2012, so quite a bit has been discovered since then. By [http://kepler.nasa.gov/ Kepler], I think? --[[User:Irino.|Irino.]] ([[User talk:Irino.|talk]]) 17:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
| − | : According to exoplanet.eu, as of 2 Dec 2013 there are 1,049 confirmed exoplanets, meaning we've confirmed more than 250 planets in the last 17-18 months. Bear in mind, though, that #1071 shows ''confirmed'' planets anywhere in the galaxy, while #1298 shows an ''estimate'' of planets within a rather narrow strip of space (habitable zones of nearby stars). {{unsigned|Fryhole}}
| |
| | | | |
| | It may just be me, but this looks like one of those colour-blindness tests (I'm r-g colour blind). I was half-looking for some hidden message or number or sumfink in the pattern of dos, but of course I'm the one that usually misses out on those things :D Can colour-typical viewers see anything odd or unexpected in the pattern of dots? Oh, also, in the explanation of the comic here, it talks about the "reddish tone" and "grey" disks ... they all look grey to me, although some are darker than others :D Note that http://xkcd.com/1071/ does NOT remind me of a colour blindness test, except in the most superficial way - a circle of dots. I think this one, 1298, does because Randall has used pastel tones. Cheers, Jon. --[[User:Jon.|Jon.]] ([[User talk:Jon.|talk]]) 16:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | | It may just be me, but this looks like one of those colour-blindness tests (I'm r-g colour blind). I was half-looking for some hidden message or number or sumfink in the pattern of dos, but of course I'm the one that usually misses out on those things :D Can colour-typical viewers see anything odd or unexpected in the pattern of dots? Oh, also, in the explanation of the comic here, it talks about the "reddish tone" and "grey" disks ... they all look grey to me, although some are darker than others :D Note that http://xkcd.com/1071/ does NOT remind me of a colour blindness test, except in the most superficial way - a circle of dots. I think this one, 1298, does because Randall has used pastel tones. Cheers, Jon. --[[User:Jon.|Jon.]] ([[User talk:Jon.|talk]]) 16:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
| | : Nothing odd or unexpected in the pattern of dots, Jon. No hidden "color blind test"-like message. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.89|199.27.128.89]] 18:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | | : Nothing odd or unexpected in the pattern of dots, Jon. No hidden "color blind test"-like message. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.89|199.27.128.89]] 18:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
| |
| − | Anyone else feel like perhaps we're still missing something here? Maybe I've simply become spoiled, but this straightforward graphic info, with no real puzzle nor pun nor humor (much less layers of these), seems ... incomplete and/or improbable. Also, what/where is the "New-New-America" or "New-New-World" discussed by Quoti above? Maybe I'm missing something major, somehow. BTW, 1K apologies for highly-likely noob errata in this, my 1st attempt at commenting here. [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 22:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Comics at xkcd do not always contain a joke. Look here: [[4: Landscape (sketch)]]. Maybe we do need a category for this.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 00:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I agree there is not always any joke, but generally there seems to be either a joke, or puzzle, or riddle, or pun, or mind-bending non sequitur ... something beyond the simple information here recognized so far. Would not be the first time I have overthought an issue (maybe not first time today!), but I sense there's more here. [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 15:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The joke resides in the hover text for this panel. The "Mister Rogers Neighborhood" reference satisfies me comedically.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pretty cool, a comic that uses a web browser's presentation timing for its wise cracks. [[User:DLuebbert|DLuebbert]] ([[User talk:DLuebbert|talk]]) 17:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [The potty 1] I'm deeply suspicious of this infographic. For a start the resemblance to a color blindness test is obvious. Second the circle around earth must have some meaning. If it was what he says it is he would probably have labelled at least the larger planets? {{unsigned|The Potty 1}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Has anyone noticed the different typography? Any Idea why it’s set in Futura and not in his own handwriting? [[User:Quoti|Quoti]] ([[User talk:Quoti|talk]]) 10:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − | : Presumably because it's available as a poster. [[User:Wwoods|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods|talk]]) 17:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets? {{unsigned ip|173.245.53.156}}
| |
| − | :Randall says: "constructed from statistical data on typical planet sizes and orbits" — so this is much more a guess. Many of those planets are still not confirmed by Earth based observatories. But Randall is showing all planets in a habitable zone, that does include Gas-Planets, Earth-sized planets are just a small part on all this planets.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | To me, it looks like a Mitchell's Best Candidate... http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/1893974 [[User:Ld75|Ld75]] ([[User talk:Ld75|talk]]) 18:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This remembers me on a graphic from the german newspaper "Die Zeit" 03/1995: http://schwertschlager.de/geschichte/klasse%2010/overkill.htm
| |
| − | It's about the overkill capacity of nuclear weapons in the second world war.--[[User:guest|guest]] 20:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It probably should be noted that the correct lyrics in "Won't You By My Neighbor?" are "It's a beautiful day in '''this''' neighborhood!" not "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood" [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.88|108.162.216.88]] 18:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Also could be Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood. Sorry for being childish.--[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
