Editing Talk:1655: Doomsday Clock
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is no one talking about the fact that the title text apparently refers to a digital clock with 24-hour display format, the one used by scientists but despised by most of the US? --[[User:Troy0|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0|talk]]) 12:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC) | Is no one talking about the fact that the title text apparently refers to a digital clock with 24-hour display format, the one used by scientists but despised by most of the US? --[[User:Troy0|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0|talk]]) 12:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | : Many digital clocks blink 00:00 when they aren't set regardless of whether they are 12-hour or 24-hour format. So the blinking 00:00 doesn't really say anything one way or the other. Non-blinking, 00:00 would mean midnight | + | : Many digital clocks blink 00:00 when they aren't set regardless of whether they are 12-hour or 24-hour format. So the blinking 00:00 doesn't really say anything one way or the other. Non-blinking, 00:00 would mean midnight. [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 18:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC) |
Why does Cueball assume that the clock hasn't *already* been moved to DST? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.153.101|162.158.153.101]] 13:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC) | Why does Cueball assume that the clock hasn't *already* been moved to DST? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.153.101|162.158.153.101]] 13:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC) |