Difference between revisions of "Talk:1740: Rosetta"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Armegeddon actually had no kinetic impact. The plot device was a bomb drilled into the surface and detonated. This did deflect the comet by splitting it on half along a fault, causing the two pieces to miss Earth.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.100|162.158.75.100]] 17:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | :Armegeddon actually had no kinetic impact. The plot device was a bomb drilled into the surface and detonated. This did deflect the comet by splitting it on half along a fault, causing the two pieces to miss Earth.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.100|162.158.75.100]] 17:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
Agreed, and edited. [[User:Beret Guy|Beret Guy]] ([[User talk:Beret Guy|talk]]) 20:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Beret Guy | Agreed, and edited. [[User:Beret Guy|Beret Guy]] ([[User talk:Beret Guy|talk]]) 20:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Beret Guy | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hasn't the fact of simply being in orbit already caused a change in the trajectory? Does impact make any difference? |
Revision as of 21:25, 30 September 2016
- Hairy's Woooo has four o's but Cueball's Wooo has only three o's. Rtanenbaum (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Armegeddon actually had no kinetic impact. The plot device was a bomb drilled into the surface and detonated. This did deflect the comet by splitting it on half along a fault, causing the two pieces to miss Earth.162.158.75.100 17:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Agreed, and edited. Beret Guy (talk) 20:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Beret Guy
Hasn't the fact of simply being in orbit already caused a change in the trajectory? Does impact make any difference?