Editing Talk:343: 1337: Part 3

<!-- Add comments to the bottom, or indent after the prior comment(s) you're replying to. Sign your post with ~~~~ to provide attribution and note the chronology. -->

I can't narrow it down, but the "I think we should stab bad guys", coming from a possibly not psychologically 'normal' young girl, comes from ''something''.  Firefly? Not sure, and I've not seen all of the Sarah Connor Chronicles yet, either, to my shame.  Too early a comic to be Parker from Leverage (right attitude, though, c.f. when she got horribly cold-read by the fake psychic and got told what he'd done to her).  But it's that sort of character. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 08:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

-Maybe the title text refers the Liar paradox, since under the paradox we can assume that all NSA people lie which would lead to the NSA man's saying no to lying = that he actually lied {{unsigned ip|108.162.223.47}}

I noticed Randall released this comic under a license for Wikipedia. 
Where is it on Wikipedia? 
[[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 18:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

;Perching on the bedpost

This posture, and the whole composition of the scene, might refers to some classical representation of the devil inspiring the {{w|Devil's Trill}} to {{w|Giuseppe Tartini}}, a sonata considered as its masterpiece. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.160|162.158.91.160]] 09:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

How do we know Steve didn’t just have really long circular bars at the ends of his bed?

in panel 3 elaine perfectly described the ipod touch

At the top of the page, there is (at the time of writing) an add about "What If? 2" and when it comes out. this is always there... exept when viewing this comic, for some reason????? -QPc_G17

I don't think that using the rug to cross the barbed wire fence should be considered a specific reference, as this is a common method of circumventing it and was used in WWI and II. It would be like saying that using boltcutters to get through a chainlink fence is a reference to Monsters Inc., it could be, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of evidence for it. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.214.170|172.71.214.170]] 04:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I don't think that using the rug to cross the barbed wire fence should be considered a specific reference, as this is a common method of circumventing it and was used in WWI and II. It would be like saying that using boltcutters to get through a chainlink fence is a reference to Monsters Inc., it could be, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of evidence for it. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.214.170\|172.71.214.170]] 04:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)		I don't think that using the rug to cross the barbed wire fence should be considered a specific reference, as this is a common method of circumventing it and was used in WWI and II. It would be like saying that using boltcutters to get through a chainlink fence is a reference to Monsters Inc., it could be, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of evidence for it. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.214.170\|172.71.214.170]] 04:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
−
−	I'm not going to undo/redo [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=343:_1337:_Part_3&curid=4076&diff=340658&oldid=326812 this edit], but it is untrue to say that you don't encrypt with a public key. You can (and often do, depending upon session type/requirements) as part of a handshaking method, using a public key that only the owner's private key can decrypt, so that only the intended recipient with their private-decrypting key can make use of what has been encrypted. (Typically double-encrypted, with the other layer being your private-encryption, for which only your publicly available decryption is valid, so that both parties now know that... as long as they trust the other's public keys for being genuine... in this particular session they can ''only'' be sharing information with the other party.) But this, and further additions of complication resulting from additionally trusted third-parties/etc, is perhaps too complicated to add up there. So just mentioning it here. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.163.48\|172.70.163.48]] 12:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)