Difference between revisions of "Talk:710: Collatz Conjecture"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "TEchnically, the 1 should lead to the four, causeing a loop. Because (1*3)+1=4, 4/2=2, 2/2=1 xD")
 
(Sign your posts, dammit.)
Line 1: Line 1:
TEchnically, the 1 should lead to the four, causeing a loop. Because (1*3)+1=4, 4/2=2, 2/2=1 xD
+
Technically, the 1 should lead to the four, causeing a loop. Because (1*3)+1=4, 4/2=2, 2/2=1 xD {{unsigned|‎87.242.215.66}}

Revision as of 23:49, 9 March 2013

Technically, the 1 should lead to the four, causeing a loop. Because (1*3)+1=4, 4/2=2, 2/2=1 xD -- ‎87.242.215.66 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)