Editing Talk:890: Etymology

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Making the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs actually makes sense. The Kessel Run is a run that travels near a black hole, as well as multiple drops into and out of light speed. Therefore, the shorter the distance it took for a pilot to make the run, the faster the ship was (to negate the gravitational pull of the black hole) and the better the pilot was (to be able to maneuver the ship more tightly). So the Kessel Run was actually a race to do it in the shortest ''distance'' possible, not the shortest time. 24 October 2016 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 17:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 
Making the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs actually makes sense. The Kessel Run is a run that travels near a black hole, as well as multiple drops into and out of light speed. Therefore, the shorter the distance it took for a pilot to make the run, the faster the ship was (to negate the gravitational pull of the black hole) and the better the pilot was (to be able to maneuver the ship more tightly). So the Kessel Run was actually a race to do it in the shortest ''distance'' possible, not the shortest time. 24 October 2016 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 17:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
βˆ’
 
βˆ’
:Honestly, I have to laugh (not at you), as your explanation is very much correct, but the whole situation is ridiculous. What started as a throw-away one-liner brag that seemingly misused an astronomical term has turned into a minor point of debate that was eventually resolved by a film centered around that one line.[[User:Ncpenguin|Ncpenguin]] ([[User talk:Ncpenguin|talk]]) 01:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 
  
 
This same sort of thing also comes up when you think about the names of many rebel/alliance fighters.  The Star Wars universe does not use our alphabet.  You can probably justify the X-wing since an X is a pretty common symbol outside of being a letter, but one must wonder about all those other letter-wings, like the Y, A, B, H, etc.  Fighters shaped after letters that don't seem to exist in Star Wars. {{unsigned ip|172.68.58.53}}
 
This same sort of thing also comes up when you think about the names of many rebel/alliance fighters.  The Star Wars universe does not use our alphabet.  You can probably justify the X-wing since an X is a pretty common symbol outside of being a letter, but one must wonder about all those other letter-wings, like the Y, A, B, H, etc.  Fighters shaped after letters that don't seem to exist in Star Wars. {{unsigned ip|172.68.58.53}}

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: