Editing Talk:917: Hofstadter

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Is it worth mentioning that Is Meta is an acronym for "I'm," the first word of the acronym? That seems like it would be in the spirit of Hofstadter and "meta," especially since Hofstadter talks a lot about the meaning of "I" in his books. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.117|108.162.237.117]] 04:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 
Is it worth mentioning that Is Meta is an acronym for "I'm," the first word of the acronym? That seems like it would be in the spirit of Hofstadter and "meta," especially since Hofstadter talks a lot about the meaning of "I" in his books. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.117|108.162.237.117]] 04:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
:I would think so. I came here to see about making that edit, including noting that the final "I'm" is both "I AM" (the ultimate autobio!) and also provides self-reference back to the start of the original phrase. [[User:Ardaglash|Ardaglash]] ([[User talk:Ardaglash|talk]]) 19:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 
  
 
Would "this acronym" imply that the sentence itself is an acronym for something much larger?  A biography, perhaps?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.218|108.162.237.218]] 14:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 
Would "this acronym" imply that the sentence itself is an acronym for something much larger?  A biography, perhaps?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.218|108.162.237.218]] 14:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Line 11: Line 10:
  
 
Should it read “I'm so meta, even this acrostic”? Or did Randall eschew correctness in favor of more readers knowing what the comic's words meant? [[User:YatharthROCK|YatharthROCK]] ([[User talk:YatharthROCK|talk]]) 22:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 
Should it read “I'm so meta, even this acrostic”? Or did Randall eschew correctness in favor of more readers knowing what the comic's words meant? [[User:YatharthROCK|YatharthROCK]] ([[User talk:YatharthROCK|talk]]) 22:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 
The explanation is factually incorrect... the prefix "meta" comes from the () Greek preposition "meta" which doesn't mean "beyond" or "out of" but merely "after". It came to mean, as a prefix, "beyond" or "reflexive", in modern european languages, via the latin neologism "metaphysica", supposed to be a translitteration of the title of Aristotle's collection of essays. This mysterious title was given by their first editor, living centuries after Aristotle, and was "ta meta ta physica", that is to say something like : "those [the books] after those regarding nature". As those mysteriously titled books concerned the general principles of reality, (including famously the "god", the divine principle of nature"), the title came wrongly to be understood as meaning "beyond nature". Eventually, the "metaphysics" of something came to be understood as dealing with the principles "beyond" a given domain, hence "meta-studies" or "meta-psychology", etc. It is, however, a mistake made since centuries... --[[User:Antinomiste|Antinomiste]] ([[User talk:Antinomiste|talk]]) 19:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 
 
The last panel's boustrophedon acronym. "Woah I Think He / Nailed It" is an acronym for "Within", if you read in boustrophedon. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.221|141.101.104.221]]
 
 
This is even cleverer than I think it is. [[User:Koro Neil|Koro Neil]] ([[User talk:Koro Neil|talk]]) 01:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 
 
So what were to happen if Hofstadter observed himself in his autobiography?  [[Special:Contributions/127.0.0.1|127.0.0.1]]
 
 
For Sale: Hofstadter's Old Baby Shoes
 
:Shoes that wore Hofstadter. [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 17:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: