Difference between revisions of "User talk:162.158.155.26"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Just one thing. Can you please stop putting the trivia thing on explanations just because a comic references one other comic? If it's a recurring theme, then fine, but for ONE COMIC? Just write it at the bottom of each explanation, no need to use trivia. Thanks! [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 04:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 
Just one thing. Can you please stop putting the trivia thing on explanations just because a comic references one other comic? If it's a recurring theme, then fine, but for ONE COMIC? Just write it at the bottom of each explanation, no need to use trivia. Thanks! [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 04:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 
: The explanation should be explanatory. Where there's a direct callback to another comic (such as with the bun detector) a reference to that comic might be explanatory, but for the most part they're not.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.26|162.158.155.26]] 09:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 
: The explanation should be explanatory. Where there's a direct callback to another comic (such as with the bun detector) a reference to that comic might be explanatory, but for the most part they're not.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.26|162.158.155.26]] 09:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 +
:: Yeah, but for one comic? Seriously?!?!? Referencing other comics happens all the time. We have the categories because THE SAME TOPICS WILL APPEAR MANY TIMES IN THIS WEBCOMIC. THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THE TRIVIA SECTION. Type "Trivia" and press search. Check the first ten results. HOW MANY TRIVIA SECTIONS ARE THERE BECAUSE IT REFERENCES JUST ONE OTHER COMIC?!?!? HUH?!?!?!? ANSWER ME!!!!!!! You are [[1731: Wrong]]. You are not [[White Hat]]. Just stop. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 12:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:36, 8 March 2018

Just one thing. Can you please stop putting the trivia thing on explanations just because a comic references one other comic? If it's a recurring theme, then fine, but for ONE COMIC? Just write it at the bottom of each explanation, no need to use trivia. Thanks! Herobrine (talk) 04:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

The explanation should be explanatory. Where there's a direct callback to another comic (such as with the bun detector) a reference to that comic might be explanatory, but for the most part they're not.162.158.155.26 09:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, but for one comic? Seriously?!?!? Referencing other comics happens all the time. We have the categories because THE SAME TOPICS WILL APPEAR MANY TIMES IN THIS WEBCOMIC. THERE IS REALLY NO NEED FOR THE TRIVIA SECTION. Type "Trivia" and press search. Check the first ten results. HOW MANY TRIVIA SECTIONS ARE THERE BECAUSE IT REFERENCES JUST ONE OTHER COMIC?!?!? HUH?!?!?!? ANSWER ME!!!!!!! You are 1731: Wrong. You are not White Hat. Just stop. Herobrine (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)