Editing 2187: Geologic Time

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 19: Line 19:
 
[[Megan]], a {{w|geologist}}, tells a story about how small the timespan of human history is compared to Earth's total history. She does this to juxtapose it with normal human time-scales, to imply that her being two weeks late turning in her project is immaterial by the standards of the Earth's tremendous age. She tries to sell this story to [[Cueball]] and [[Hairbun]], but Hairbun's response does not seem to bode well for Megan.
 
[[Megan]], a {{w|geologist}}, tells a story about how small the timespan of human history is compared to Earth's total history. She does this to juxtapose it with normal human time-scales, to imply that her being two weeks late turning in her project is immaterial by the standards of the Earth's tremendous age. She tries to sell this story to [[Cueball]] and [[Hairbun]], but Hairbun's response does not seem to bode well for Megan.
  
Megan's delay of two weeks would map to about eight nanometers on the football field.  The most powerful {{w|electron microscopes}} have a magnification of ten million, which would make it look like about eight centimeters (about three inches), so her statement about it being "too small to see even with a powerful microscope" is a bit of an exaggeration.  The most powerful <i>optical</i> microscope has 6500x magnification,([https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/science/08obscope.html New York Times, March 8, 2011]) which would indeed be inadequate.
+
Megan's delay of two weeks would map to three nanometers on the football field.  The most powerful {{w|electron microscopes}} have a magnification of ten million, which would make it look like three centimeters (about an inch), so her statement about it being "too small to see even with a powerful microscope" is a bit of an exaggeration.  The most powerful <i>optical</i> microscope has 6500x magnification,([https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/science/08obscope.html New York Times, March 8, 2011]) which would indeed be inadequate.
  
 
[[Randall]] states in the caption that this is a trick that geologists always try to use when being late turning something in.
 
[[Randall]] states in the caption that this is a trick that geologists always try to use when being late turning something in.

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)