Editing 2356: Constellation Monstrosity
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
+ | {{incomplete|Created by THE WILL OF THE SAGICAPRIQUARIUS. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | ||
− | {{w|Constellation}}s in the night sky are formed by pattern-forming various {{w|Asterism (astronomy)|asterisms}} and other stellar relationships in the night sky | + | {{w|Constellation}}s in the night sky are formed by pattern-forming various {{w|Asterism (astronomy)|asterisms}} and other stellar relationships in the night sky. |
− | + | Being rather subjective, {{w|Chinese constellations|different cultures}} have inculcated differences in their interpretations, some subtle and others less so, for the exact same objective views of the night sky. Even where the same groupings are recognised, different cultures can 'see' different forms behind that group of stars. However, observers in the southern hemisphere will see entirely new constellations not visible to those in the northern one, and vice-versa, whilst observing those patterns fully visible to both (on the {{w|ecliptic}}) as inverted and therefore may inspire vastly different conceptualised images or even connectivities. The {{w|International Astronomical Union}} has demarcated the sky into {{w|IAU designated constellations|88 constellations}}, mostly those known to ancient Greece (catalogued by Ptolemy) plus southern constellations designated by astronomers during the European Renaissance. | |
− | + | Randall has taken one particular {{w|zodiac}} (or at least part of the hellenic one, closely tied to western astrology and still inspring astronomical naming) and imagined further lines connecting stars to link up four separate constellations, to create a portmanteau constellation with a {{w|portmanteau}} name. As a matter of fact, this connection is half true, since Libra used to be the two claws of a much larger Scorpio, the larger constellation having been split in two when the twelve zodiac signs were set as they are now. | |
− | + | The four constellations used here are Scorpio (the scorpion), Libra (the scales), Virgo (the virgin/maiden) and Leo (the lion), sequentially spread across the sky in positions relating to a span of astrological dates running 'backwards' from late November through to late July. The name Randall gave this meta-constellation, however, uses a different order to combine as "Virg(o, l)ibra(, )scorp(io & )leo". Possibly "Scorlibir{{w|Goleo}}", or a similar mash-up with the same source order, did not roll together nicely enough for his liking. | |
− | + | In reality, any apparent proximity of stars on the {{w|celestial sphere}} does not guarantee an actual proximity in the depths of space, either within or between constellations. Knock-on effects from this renaming would not change actual scientific understanding, but it could have a knock-on effect upon star catalogues and databases if this object regrouping forces so many incidental name changes to the current referencing system. Similarly, astrology's conceit based upon four separate 'characters' and life-paths, arising from birth-signs and planetary transits across four distinct areas of the sky, would lose 'precision' if forced to accept a single symbolic area in their stead. It's not clear how Randall hoped to alter the practices of either group with his changes, but he was banned from the IAU for his efforts ([[:Category:Banned from conferences|not the first time this has happened]]). Randall previously mentioned being banned from the IAU in [[541: TED Talk]], but now we know the reason why, or perhaps he was reinstated and then banned again. | |
+ | |||
+ | This monstrosity is reminiscent of the infamous 2009 Dutch horror film known as {{w|The Human Centipede (First Sequence)|The Human Centipede}}, in which three humans are bound together such that their digestive systems are connected in sequence (that film was released in August 2009, while Randall referenced being banned by the IAU in February 2009, but perhaps that makes this construction all the more depraved if he came up with it himself, or he was reinstated sometime thereafter and then banned again for this "suggestion"). In this image, the head of Virgo appears to be connected to the hindquarters of Leo, and likewise the mouthparts of Scorpio are fixed to the bottom of the "stand" of Libra. Libra's stand appears to go under Virgo's dress; to form a complete "celestial centipede", it should attach to Virgo's hindquarters, but judging by the connection between stars, it probably (mercifully) connects to her foot. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The title text mentions how astronomers and astrologers are angry at this constellation, with the reasons seen in said title text. | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
+ | {{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | ||
:[Within a frame, a long title is written in a short arc above the drawn elements] | :[Within a frame, a long title is written in a short arc above the drawn elements] | ||
:Virgibrascorpleo | :Virgibrascorpleo | ||
Line 27: | Line 33: | ||
:[Red lines have been added to link stars in adjacent constellations.] | :[Red lines have been added to link stars in adjacent constellations.] | ||
− | :[ {{w| | + | :[ {{w|Beta Scorpii}} may be connected to {{w|Sigma Librae}} (once known as Gamma Scorpii)] |
− | :[...also {{w| | + | :[ ...also {{w|Pi Scorpii}} may be connected to {{w|Tau Librae}}] |
− | :[ {{w| | + | :[ {{w|Beta Librae}} may be connected to {{w|Mu Virginis}}] |
− | :[ {{w|Nu Virginis}} | + | :[ {{w|Nu Virginis}} may be connected to Beta Leonis (better known as {{w|Denebola}})] |
:[Caption below the frame] | :[Caption below the frame] | ||
Line 41: | Line 47: | ||
[[Category:Comics with color]] | [[Category:Comics with color]] | ||
[[Category:Banned from conferences]] | [[Category:Banned from conferences]] | ||
− |