Editing 2858: Thanksgiving Arguments

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
The comic features a conversation between [[Cueball]] and [[Megan]], discussing the dynamics of family gatherings during {{w|Thanksgiving (United States)|Thanksgiving}}, specifically about the topics of political arguments and how to navigate them. This was a topical comic, as Thanksgiving in the United States in 2023 was on November 23, the day after the posting of this comic.
+
{{incomplete|LITERALLY created by a BOT. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
  
In the first panel, Cueball is depicted sitting at a computer, presumably writing an article or blog post titled "How to Win Political Arguments with Your Awful Relatives at Thanksgiving Dinner" - a common topic for 'filler' articles at this time of year. Such articles are based on the perception that political arguments are common at holiday dinners. This is likely based on the idea that people will tend to avoid relatives with "awful" political views, but holiday dinners carry the expectation that the whole family will be together, making such arguments difficult to avoid.  
+
The comic features a conversation between [[Cueball]] and [[Megan]], discussing the dynamics of family gatherings during {{w|Thanksgiving (United States)|Thanksgiving}}, specifically about the topics of political arguments and how to navigate them. This was a topical comic, as Thanksgiving in the United States was on November 22 of 2023, the day after the posting of this comic.
  
Megan challenges this perception, citing [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poll-nobody-fights-thanksgiving_n_5deece02e4b07f6835b7eab6 an article in ''Huffington Post''] which reports on a poll which found that only 16% of families reported discussing politics at Thanksgiving dinner, and only 3% reporting having argued about politics. She also points out that Cueball's family has political views that are "mostly fine". This is probably not especially uncommon, as families tend to share similar experiences and backgrounds, which inform their political opinions. Where disagreements do occur, it's common for those to be minor, and not the subject of particularly emotional arguments. In addition, where politics are a source of friction within a family, most learn not to bring it up at holiday gatherings, precisely to avoid such arguments.  
+
In the first panel, Cueball is depicted sitting at a computer, presumably writing an article or blog post titled "How to Win Political Arguments with Your Awful Relatives at Thanksgiving Dinner." This sets up the premise of the comic, implying that political discussions during family gatherings can be contentious and that there is a desire to "win" these discussions, treating them as debates or conflicts rather than dialogues. In addition, the relatives concerned (who are perhaps usually avoidable, except during seasonally expected gatherings) are considered "awful" – a personal opinion that is possibly reciprocated, although it would actually be worse if it is not.
  
The misperception at the root of this may be a case of selection bias. There certainly are families in which members hold opposing political views{{Citation needed}} with such emotional fervor that gatherings typically devolve into arguments. Since those arguments can be so intense and emotional (and often personally hurtful), the people involved are far more likely to relate their experiences to others, both in person and in media (such as in articles, columns, and portrayal in fiction). By contrast, people who have quiet, undramatic family dinners are less likely to get attention. This can give rise to the perception that heated political arguments are the norm for such gatherings.  
+
The second panel shifts to Megan, who challenges the assumption that political arguments are common at Thanksgiving by referencing surveys that indicate most families don't actually engage in political arguments during the holiday, with [[Randall]] citing [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poll-nobody-fights-thanksgiving_n_5deece02e4b07f6835b7eab6 an article in ''Huffington Post''] in support of her statement. This panel introduces a counterpoint to Cueball's assumption, suggesting that the narrative of inevitable political conflict might be exaggerated or not universally applicable. In the third panel, Megan further suggests that Cueball's relatives have "fine" political opinions and that these differences are not the root cause of arguments. She proposes that Cueball could instead focus on writing about the actual topics that lead to arguments, suggesting that there is a disconnect between Cueball’s perception and the reality of family discussions.
  
The comic concludes by revealing that Cueball's family, rather than arguing about politics, tends to argue about ''{{w|The Rise of Skywalker}}'', a controversial recent entry in the {{w|Star Wars}} franchise, with Megan agreeing that his aunt "brings that up a lot". The joke is that Cueball's family, like him, tend to have nerdy, pop-culture-based passions, and those are areas that are far more likely to result in family debates. The title text extends this theme by referencing the mother's devotion to the 2003 movie ''{{w|The Core}}'' (widely considered a contender for "{{w|The Core#Reception|all-time-worst 'science in a movie' winner}}") and her insistence on watching it annually during Thanksgiving is mentioned as a bone of contention within the family. This underscores the idea that perceptions of a "normal" family gathering (ie, arguing about politics) aren't necessarily applicable to most families. The individual character and eccentricities of each family are far more likely to define what their holidays are like.
+
The fourth panel concludes with Cueball reflecting on a recurring argument that does take place at his family's Thanksgiving dinner, which is not about politics but about ''{{w|Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker}},'' which was poorly received for a Star Wars film which nonetheless may have some fans with less trenchantly negative opinions; it is left ambiguous exactly what fervent opinions are raised, but they do seem to add some form of tension. Thus Cueball's family apparently does indeed have a 'tradition' of recurring ideological arguments, for at least the last four years, but they are centered around a topic that is less serious and more in the realm of pop culture. The punchline lies in the juxtaposition of the expectation of serious political debates with the reality of a trivial argument that has become a peculiar (and necessarily quite recently inaugurated) tradition, highlighting the idiosyncrasies of family gatherings.
 +
 
 +
The comic humorously encapsulates the heightened expectation of political debates at family gatherings, a cultural narrative especially prominent during Thanksgiving. However, the actual experience often deviates from this expectation, with families either avoiding such topics or engaging in entirely different kinds of disputes. The comic satirically suggests that these arguments might be over trivial matters, such as pop culture references, rather than the anticipated political disagreements. This portrayal subtly critiques the societal assumption about family conflicts during holidays and implies that the reality is much more nuanced and varied, with each family having its unique quirks and traditions that may or may not align with common stereotypes.
 +
 
 +
The title text extends this theme by introducing another layer of familial tradition that could be a source of tension, albeit mild. In this case, the mother's devotion to the 2003 movie ''{{w|The Core}}'' (widely considered a contender for "{{w|The Core#Reception|all-time-worst 'science in a movie' winner}}") and her insistence on watching it annually during Thanksgiving becomes a humorous bone of contention within the family. The varying levels of enthusiasm for this tradition among family members illustrate the comic's broader commentary on family dynamics: that tensions during gatherings often arise from personal idiosyncrasies and peculiar family rituals, rather than from the expected ideological clashes. It underscores the idea that while families may not always share the same passions, these unique and sometimes eccentric traditions define the character and the memories of family gatherings.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
:[Cueball is sitting on an office chair at his desk typing on his stationary computer as Megan walks up behind him. The text he writes is shown above the screen with a zigzag line going from a starburst on the screen.]
+
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
:Text: ''How to win political arguments with your awful relatives at Thanksgiving dinner''
+
 
 +
:[Cueball types on a computer. Megan walks up behind him.]
 +
:Computer: ''How to win political arguments with your awful relatives at Thanksgiving dinner''
  
:[Closeup of Megan in a frame-less panel. Below Megan there is a footnote relating to the asterisk at the end of her sentence.]
+
:[Closeup on Megan.]
:Megan: You know, despite all the posts about it, surveys show most families don't actually argue about politics at Thanksgiving.<sup>*</sup>
+
:Megan: You know, despite all the posts about it, surveys show most families don't actually argue about politics at Thanksgiving.*
:Footnote: <sup>*</sup><nowiki>https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poll-nobody-fights-thanksgiving_n_5deece02e4b07f6835b7eab6</nowiki>
+
:Footnote: *https://www.huffpost.com/entry/poll-nobody-fights-thanksgiving_n_5deece02e4b07f6835b7eab6
  
:[Zoom back on to Cueball and Megan. Cueball has turned around in his chair, hands on his lap, looking up at Megan.]
+
:[Zoom back on to Cueball and Megan. Cueball has turned around in his chair to look at Megan.]
 
:Megan: Take ''your'' relatives. Their political opinions are basically fine.
 
:Megan: Take ''your'' relatives. Their political opinions are basically fine.
 
:Megan: Maybe you should write about what ''they'' argue about?
 
:Megan: Maybe you should write about what ''they'' argue about?
  
:[Closeup of Cueball typing on his computer. The text he writes is again shown above the screen with a zigzag line going from a starburst on the screen. Megan speaks to him from off-panel, her speech line coming from a starburst at the right edge of the panel.]
+
:[Closeup on Cueball typing.]
:Text: ''How to win arguments about '''The Rise of Skywalker''' at your Thanksgiving dinner''
+
:Computer: ''How to win arguments about '''The Rise of Skywalker''' at your Thanksgiving dinner''
 
:Megan (off-panel): Aunt Katie ''does'' bring that up a lot, doesn't she.
 
:Megan (off-panel): Aunt Katie ''does'' bring that up a lot, doesn't she.
 
:Cueball: This'll be year four.
 
:Cueball: This'll be year four.
Line 44: Line 50:
 
[[Category:Politics]]
 
[[Category:Politics]]
 
[[Category:Star Wars]]
 
[[Category:Star Wars]]
[[Category:Holidays]]
 
[[Category:The Core]]
 
[[Category:Comics with lowercase text]] <!-- citation/URI -->
 
[[Category:Footnotes]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)