Editing 2927: Alphabetical Cartogram

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
−
This comic shows a map of the {{w|United States}}, with every state resized based on where it appears in an alphabetical list of states. Hence {{w|Alabama}} is the largest state and {{w|Wyoming}} is the smallest. The joke is that the comic purports to "be more fair". But there's nothing fair or unfair about sizing states by alphabetical order, whether or not it is 'fair' in the first place to have states being shown as bigger or smaller merely because of raw geographical fact (and perhaps a ''little'' bit of [[977: Map Projections|cartographic bias]]).
+
{{incomplete|Created by a SUSPICIOUSLY SMALLER-THAN-USUAL BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
  
−
Wyoming shrank the most proportionally in geographical size, while {{w|Delaware}} grew the most. Compared to a {{w|List of U.S. states and territories by area|ranking of US states by area}}, {{w|Texas}} dropped the most (41 places), while Delaware and {{w|Connecticut}} rose the most (also 41 places). South Carolina and Vermont did not change rank.
+
This comic shows a map of the {{w|United States}}, with every state resized based on where it appears in an alphabetical list of states. Hence {{w|Alabama}} is the largest state, {{w|Wyoming}} is the smallest.
 +
 
 +
Wyoming shrank the most, while {{w|Delaware}} grew the largest proportionally in geographical size. In the ranking of US states {{w|List of U.S. states and territories by area|by area}}, {{w|Texas}}'s position dropped the most (41 places), while Delaware and {{w|Connecticut}}'s positions rose the most (also 41 places).
  
 
This coincides with a recent [https://record.umich.edu/articles/study-alphabetical-order-of-surnames-may-affect-grading/ study] from the University of Michigan showing that the alphabetical order of surnames leads to differences in grading.
 
This coincides with a recent [https://record.umich.edu/articles/study-alphabetical-order-of-surnames-may-affect-grading/ study] from the University of Michigan showing that the alphabetical order of surnames leads to differences in grading.
  
−
With 2024 being an election year in the United States, this comic may be a spoof on [https://web.archive.org/web/20230526150825/https://blog.mapchart.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MapChart_Map-1-1536x1115.webp electoral cartograms], which resize the states based on their number of electoral votes (roughly the same as resizing them based on population).
+
The title text creates a portmanteau of the words “wee,” which means “little,” and “Wyoming,” making fun of how small it is on this map, since "W" appears at the end of the alphabet.
−
 
 
−
The title text creates a portmanteau of the words “wee,” which means “little,” and “Wyoming,” making fun of how small it is on this map, since Wyoming appears last on the alphabetical list of states, it could also refer to [[2926: Doppler Effect|the previous comic, which discussed siren noises]].
 
  
 
Bias resulting from alphabetical order was also the topic of [[2789: Making Plans]].
 
Bias resulting from alphabetical order was also the topic of [[2789: Making Plans]].
−
 
−
It should be noted that the resizing is not done perfectly in the drawing. For example, {{w|Vermont}} appears slightly larger than {{w|Texas}}, and {{w|Idaho}} appears smaller than {{w|Missouri}}. The map strikes a balance between actually making the sizes of the states correspond to their alphabetical order, keeping the shapes of the states correct, and making the {{w|Contiguous United States|"lower 48"}} states fit together contiguously. The shapes of many states are significantly warped, such as {{w|Maryland}}, {{w|Delaware}}, and {{w|New York (state)|New York}} (which is lacking {{w|Long Island}}).
 
−
 
−
The table below ranks the states according to their actual size, their alphabetical order, and their approximate size as they are drawn in the comic.
 
  
 
===Table of states===
 
===Table of states===
  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right;"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right;"
−
! rowspan="3" | State                                      <!-- column 1    -->
+
!
−
! colspan="4" | Real Life                                 <!-- columns 2-5 -->
+
! colspan="4" | Real Life
−
! colspan="2" | Listings                                   <!-- columns 6,7 -->
+
! colspan="2" | Listings
−
! colspan="3" | Actual Sizes in the<br>Comic (Approximate) <!-- columns 8-10 -->
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
                                        <!-- column 1    -->
+
! rowspan=2 | State
−
! colspan="2" | Total Area             <!-- columns 2,3 -->
+
! colspan=2 | Total Area
−
! rowspan="2" | % of the<br/>US         <!-- column 4    -->
+
! rowspan=2 | % of the<br />US
−
! rowspan="2" | Area<br/>ranking        <!-- column 5    -->
+
! rowspan=2 | Area<br />#
−
! rowspan="2" | Alphabetic<br/>ranking  <!-- column 6    -->
+
! rowspan=2 | Alpha<br />#
−
! rowspan="2" | Ranking<br/>adjustment  <!-- column 7    -->
+
! rowspan=2 | Rank<br />dif.
−
! rowspan="2" | Area<br/>(pixels)      <!-- column 8    -->
 
−
! rowspan="2" | % of<br/>total          <!-- column 9    -->
 
−
! rowspan="2" | Comic<br/>ranking      <!-- column 10    -->
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
                                        <!-- column 1    -->
+
! style=width:3.5em | sq mi
−
! style="width:3.5em" | sq mi           <!-- column 2    -->
+
! style=width:3.5em | km<sup>2</sup>
−
! style="width:3.5em" | km<sup>2</sup>  <!-- column 3    -->
 
−
                                        <!-- columns 4..7 -->
 
−
                                        <!-- columns 8..10 -->
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Alaska        ||665,384||1,723,337||17.53% || 1|| 2||data-sort-value= "+1" style="background-color:#FDD"| 1 &#9660; ||27329||4.26%||5
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Alaska        ||665,384||1,723,337||17.53% || 1|| 2||data-sort-value= "+1" style="background-color:#FDD"| 1 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Texas        ||268,596|| 695,662|| 7.07% || 2||43||data-sort-value="+41" style="background-color:#F00"|41 &#9660; ||3122||0.487%||44
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Texas        ||268,596|| 695,662|| 7.07% || 2||43||data-sort-value="+41" style="background-color:#F00"|41 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|California    ||163,695|| 423,970|| 4.31% || 3|| 5||data-sort-value= "+2" style="background-color:#FDD"| 2 &#9660; ||25285||3.94%||6
+
|style="text-align:left;"|California    ||163,695|| 423,970|| 4.31% || 3|| 5||data-sort-value= "+2" style="background-color:#FDD"| 2 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Montana      ||147,040|| 380,800|| 3.87% || 4||26||data-sort-value="+22" style="background-color:#F66"|22 &#9660; ||13781||2.15%||24
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Montana      ||147,040|| 380,800|| 3.87% || 4||26||data-sort-value="+22" style="background-color:#F66"|22 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|New Mexico    ||121,590|| 314,915|| 3.20% || 5||31||data-sort-value="+26" style="background-color:#F55"|26 &#9660; ||9768||1.52%||29
+
|style="text-align:left;"|New Mexico    ||121,590|| 314,915|| 3.20% || 5||31||data-sort-value="+26" style="background-color:#F55"|26 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Arizona      ||113,990|| 295,254|| 3.00% || 6|| 3||data-sort-value= "-3" style="background-color:#DFD"| 3 &#9650; ||29710||4.63%||3
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Arizona      ||113,990|| 295,254|| 3.00% || 6|| 3||data-sort-value= "-3" style="background-color:#DFD"| 3 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Nevada        ||110,572|| 286,382|| 2.91% || 7||28||data-sort-value="+21" style="background-color:#F77"|21 &#9660; ||10754||1.68%||26
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Nevada        ||110,572|| 286,382|| 2.91% || 7||28||data-sort-value="+21" style="background-color:#F77"|21 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Colorado      ||104,094|| 269,601|| 2.74% || 8|| 6||data-sort-value= "-2" style="background-color:#DFD"| 2 &#9650; ||27929||4.35%||4
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Colorado      ||104,094|| 269,601|| 2.74% || 8|| 6||data-sort-value= "-2" style="background-color:#DFD"| 2 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Oregon        || 98,379|| 254,806|| 2.59% || 9||37||data-sort-value="+28" style="background-color:#F44"|28 &#9660; ||6959||1.09%||36
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Oregon        || 98,379|| 254,806|| 2.59% || 9||37||data-sort-value="+28" style="background-color:#F44"|28 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Wyoming      || 97,813|| 253,335|| 2.58% ||10||50||data-sort-value="+40" style="background-color:#F00"|40 &#9660; ||383||0.0597%||50
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Wyoming      || 97,813|| 253,335|| 2.58% ||10||50||data-sort-value="+40" style="background-color:#F00"|40 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Michigan      || 96,714|| 250,493|| 2.55% ||11||22||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660; ||10150||1.58%||27
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Michigan      || 96,714|| 250,493|| 2.55% ||11||22||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Minnesota    || 86,936|| 225,163|| 2.29% ||12||23||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660; ||15491||2.42%||20
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Minnesota    || 86,936|| 225,163|| 2.29% ||12||23||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Utah          || 84,897|| 219,882|| 2.24% ||13||44||data-sort-value="+31" style="background-color:#F33"|31 &#9660; ||5035||0.785%||38
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Utah          || 84,897|| 219,882|| 2.24% ||13||44||data-sort-value="+31" style="background-color:#F33"|31 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Idaho        || 83,569|| 216,443|| 2.20% ||14||12||data-sort-value= "-2" style="background-color:#DFD"| 2 &#9650; ||11253||1.75%||25
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Idaho        || 83,569|| 216,443|| 2.20% ||14||12||data-sort-value= "-2" style="background-color:#DFD"| 2 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Kansas        || 82,278|| 213,100|| 2.17% ||15||16||data-sort-value= "+1" style="background-color:#FDD"| 1 &#9660; ||14515||2.26%||22
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Kansas        || 82,278|| 213,100|| 2.17% ||15||16||data-sort-value= "+1" style="background-color:#FDD"| 1 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Nebraska      || 77,348|| 200,330|| 2.04% ||16||27||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660; ||9632||1.50%||30
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Nebraska      || 77,348|| 200,330|| 2.04% ||16||27||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|South Dakota  || 77,116|| 199,729|| 2.03% ||17||41||data-sort-value="+24" style="background-color:#F66"|24 &#9660; ||4087||0.637%||42
+
|style="text-align:left;"|South Dakota  || 77,116|| 199,729|| 2.03% ||17||41||data-sort-value="+24" style="background-color:#F66"|24 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Washington    || 71,298|| 184,661|| 1.88% ||18||47||data-sort-value="+29" style="background-color:#F44"|29 &#9660; ||1687||0.263%||47
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Washington    || 71,298|| 184,661|| 1.88% ||18||47||data-sort-value="+29" style="background-color:#F44"|29 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|North Dakota  || 70,698|| 183,108|| 1.86% ||19||34||data-sort-value="+15" style="background-color:#F99"|15 &#9660; ||9797||1.53%||28
+
|style="text-align:left;"|North Dakota  || 70,698|| 183,108|| 1.86% ||19||34||data-sort-value="+15" style="background-color:#F99"|15 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Oklahoma      || 69,899|| 181,037|| 1.841%||20||36||data-sort-value="+16" style="background-color:#F88"|16 &#9660; ||7493||1.17%||32
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Oklahoma      || 69,899|| 181,037|| 1.841%||20||36||data-sort-value="+16" style="background-color:#F88"|16 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Missouri      || 69,707|| 180,540||1.836%||21||25||data-sort-value= "+4" style="background-color:#FCC"| 4 &#9660; ||16016||2.50%||17
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Missouri      || 69,707|| 180,540||1.836%||21||25||data-sort-value= "+4" style="background-color:#FCC"| 4 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Florida      || 65,758|| 170,312|| 1.732%||22|| 9||data-sort-value="-13" style="background-color:#9F9"|13 &#9650; ||22794||3.55%||8
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Florida      || 65,758|| 170,312|| 1.732%||22|| 9||data-sort-value="-13" style="background-color:#9F9"|13 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Wisconsin    || 65,496|| 169,635|| 1.725%||23||49||data-sort-value="+26" style="background-color:#F55"|26 &#9660; ||1098||0.171%||49
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Wisconsin    || 65,496|| 169,635|| 1.725%||23||49||data-sort-value="+26" style="background-color:#F55"|26 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Georgia      || 59,425|| 153,910|| 1.565%||24||10||data-sort-value="-14" style="background-color:#9F9"|14 &#9650; ||20650||3.22%||9
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Georgia      || 59,425|| 153,910|| 1.565%||24||10||data-sort-value="-14" style="background-color:#9F9"|14 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Illinois      || 57,914|| 149,995|| 1.525%||25||13||data-sort-value="-12" style="background-color:#AFA"|12 &#9650; ||19537||3.05%||10
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Illinois      || 57,914|| 149,995|| 1.525%||25||13||data-sort-value="-12" style="background-color:#AFA"|12 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Iowa          || 56,273|| 145,746|| 1.482%||26||15||data-sort-value="-11" style="background-color:#AFA"|11 &#9650; ||16925||2.64%||15
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Iowa          || 56,273|| 145,746|| 1.482%||26||15||data-sort-value="-11" style="background-color:#AFA"|11 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|New York      || 54,555|| 141,297|| 1.437%||27||32||data-sort-value= "+5" style="background-color:#FCC"| 5 &#9660; ||7402||1.15%||34
+
|style="text-align:left;"|New York      || 54,555|| 141,297|| 1.437%||27||32||data-sort-value= "+5" style="background-color:#FCC"| 5 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|North Carolina|| 53,819|| 139,391|| 1.418%||28||33||data-sort-value= "+5" style="background-color:#FCC"| 5 &#9660; ||6982||1.09%||35
+
|style="text-align:left;"|North Carolina|| 53,819|| 139,391|| 1.418%||28||33||data-sort-value= "+5" style="background-color:#FCC"| 5 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Arkansas      || 53,179|| 137,732|| 1.401%||29|| 4||data-sort-value="-25" style="background-color:#5F5"|25 &#9650; ||31942||4.98%||2
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Arkansas      || 53,179|| 137,732|| 1.401%||29|| 4||data-sort-value="-25" style="background-color:#5F5"|25 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Alabama      || 52,420|| 135,767|| 1.381%||30|| 1||data-sort-value="-29" style="background-color:#4F4"|29 &#9650; ||34207||5.33%||1
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Alabama      || 52,420|| 135,767|| 1.381%||30|| 1||data-sort-value="-29" style="background-color:#4F4"|29 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Louisiana    || 52,378|| 135,659|| 1.380%||31||18||data-sort-value="-13" style="background-color:#9F9"|13 &#9650; ||15720||2.45%||18
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Louisiana    || 52,378|| 135,659|| 1.380%||31||18||data-sort-value="-13" style="background-color:#9F9"|13 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Mississippi  || 48,432|| 125,438|| 1.276%||32||24||data-sort-value= "-8" style="background-color:#BFB"| 8 &#9650; ||16412||2.56%||16
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Mississippi  || 48,432|| 125,438|| 1.276%||32||24||data-sort-value= "-8" style="background-color:#BFB"| 8 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Pennsylvania  || 46,054|| 119,280|| 1.213%||33||38||data-sort-value= "+5" style="background-color:#FCC"| 5 &#9660; ||6025||0.939%||37
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Pennsylvania  || 46,054|| 119,280|| 1.213%||33||38||data-sort-value= "+5" style="background-color:#FCC"| 5 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Ohio          || 44,826|| 116,098|| 1.181%||34||35||data-sort-value= "+1" style="background-color:#FDD"| 1 &#9660; ||4865||0.759%||39
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Ohio          || 44,826|| 116,098|| 1.181%||34||35||data-sort-value= "+1" style="background-color:#FDD"| 1 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Virginia      || 42,775|| 110,787|| 1.127%||35||46||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660; ||1863||0.290%||46
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Virginia      || 42,775|| 110,787|| 1.127%||35||46||data-sort-value="+11" style="background-color:#FAA"|11 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Tennessee    || 42,144|| 109,153|| 1.110%||36||42||data-sort-value= "+6" style="background-color:#FCC"| 6 &#9660; ||4588||0.715%||40
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Tennessee    || 42,144|| 109,153|| 1.110%||36||42||data-sort-value= "+6" style="background-color:#FCC"| 6 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Kentucky      || 40,408|| 104,656|| 1.064%||37||17||data-sort-value="-20" style="background-color:#7F7"|20 &#9650; ||18557||2.89%||12
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Kentucky      || 40,408|| 104,656|| 1.064%||37||17||data-sort-value="-20" style="background-color:#7F7"|20 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Indiana      || 36,420||   94,326|| 0.959%||38||14||data-sort-value="-24" style="background-color:#6F6"|24 &#9650; ||15719||2.45%||19
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Indiana      || 36,420|| 94,326|| 0.959%||38||14||data-sort-value="-24" style="background-color:#6F6"|24 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Maine        || 35,380||   91,633|| 0.932%||39||19||data-sort-value="-20" style="background-color:#7F7"|20 &#9650; ||16950||2.64%||14
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Maine        || 35,380|| 91,633|| 0.932%||39||19||data-sort-value="-20" style="background-color:#7F7"|20 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|South Carolina|| 32,020||   82,933|| 0.843%||40||40||data-sort-value=  "0" style="background-color:#FFD"| 0 &#9664; ||4482||0.699%||41
+
|style="text-align:left;"|South Carolina|| 32,020|| 82,933|| 0.843%||40||40||data-sort-value=  "0" style="background-color:#FFD"| 0 &#9664;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|West Virginia || 24,230||   62,756|| 0.638%||41||48||data-sort-value= "+7" style="background-color:#FBB"| 7 &#9660; ||1136||0.177%||48
+
|style="text-align:left;"|West Virginia || 24,230|| 62,756|| 0.638%||41||48||data-sort-value= "+7" style="background-color:#FBB"| 7 &#9660;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Maryland      || 12,406||   32,131|| 0.327%||42||20||data-sort-value="-22" style="background-color:#6F6"|22 &#9650; ||13811||2.15%||23
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Maryland      || 12,406|| 32,131|| 0.327%||42||20||data-sort-value="-22" style="background-color:#6F6"|22 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Hawaii        || 10,932||   28,313|| 0.288%||43||11||data-sort-value="-32" style="background-color:#3F3"|32 &#9650; ||15000||2.34%||21
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Hawaii        || 10,932|| 28,313|| 0.288%||43||11||data-sort-value="-32" style="background-color:#3F3"|32 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Massachusetts || 10,554||   27,336|| 0.278%||44||21||data-sort-value="-23" style="background-color:#6F6"|23 &#9650; ||17734||2.77%||13
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Massachusetts || 10,554|| 27,336|| 0.278%||44||21||data-sort-value="-23" style="background-color:#6F6"|23 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Vermont      ||  9,616||   24,906|| 0.253%||45||45||data-sort-value="  0" style="background-color:#FFD"| 0 &#9664; ||2554||0.398%||45
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Vermont      ||  9,616|| 24,906|| 0.253%||45||45||data-sort-value="  0" style="background-color:#FFD"| 0 &#9664;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|New Hampshire ||  9,349||   24,214|| 0.246%||46||29||data-sort-value="-17" style="background-color:#8F8"|17 &#9650; ||8994||1.40%||31
+
|style="text-align:left;"|New Hampshire ||  9,349|| 24,214|| 0.246%||46||29||data-sort-value="-17" style="background-color:#8F8"|17 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|New Jersey    ||  8,723||   22,591|| 0.230%||47||30||data-sort-value="-17" style="background-color:#8F8"|17 &#9650; ||7432||1.16%||33
+
|style="text-align:left;"|New Jersey    ||  8,723|| 22,591|| 0.230%||47||30||data-sort-value="-17" style="background-color:#8F8"|17 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Connecticut  ||  5,543||   14,357|| 0.146%||48|| 7||data-sort-value="-41" style="background-color:#0F0"|41 &#9650; ||24549||3.83%||7
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Connecticut  ||  5,543|| 14,357|| 0.146%||48|| 7||data-sort-value="-41" style="background-color:#0F0"|41 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Delaware      ||  2,489||   6,446|| 0.066%||49|| 8||data-sort-value="-41" style="background-color:#0F0"|41 &#9650; ||19332||3.01%||11
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Delaware      ||  2,489||   6,446|| 0.066%||49|| 8||data-sort-value="-41" style="background-color:#0F0"|41 &#9650;
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="text-align:left;"|Rhode Island  ||  1,545||   4,001|| 0.041%||50||39||data-sort-value="-11" style="background-color:#AFA"|11 &#9650; ||3950||0.616%||43
+
|style="text-align:left;"|Rhode Island  ||  1,545||   4,001|| 0.041%||50||39||data-sort-value="-11" style="background-color:#AFA"|11 &#9650;
 
|}
 
|}
  

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page:

Retrieved from "https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2927:_Alphabetical_Cartogram"