Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| | | |
| :I think that’s the more likely ‘correct’ interpretation, honestly. Maybe we should add more detail now that it’s mentioned? [[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 12:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | | :I think that’s the more likely ‘correct’ interpretation, honestly. Maybe we should add more detail now that it’s mentioned? [[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 12:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC) |
− | :At the least the list of categories is incomplete. The broader question is whether there are concentrations of papers in some areas of feature space (a subjectively plausible conclusion - I could offer some examples from botany such as "we compared the performance of several cultivars of a crop species under specific conditions") or do papers fall into a relatively flat continuum in that space. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.78|141.101.107.78]] 11:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| Should we add another colum to include the corresponding LaTeX template? Some of them seem like that could easily be found. | | Should we add another colum to include the corresponding LaTeX template? Some of them seem like that could easily be found. |
Line 30: |
Line 29: |
| | | |
| ::I interpret them as a mix of "over-generalized" headlines and less-than-literal summaries of that general sort of paper's content. [[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 14:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | | ::I interpret them as a mix of "over-generalized" headlines and less-than-literal summaries of that general sort of paper's content. [[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 14:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC) |
− | ::I read (e.g., for starters) "We put a camera somewhere new" both as very true to the emotional spirit ''and'' a paraphrasing of the true archetype membership being referenced - such as something like "Rat-mounted cameras for remote surveying of sewer pipes" (if that's not already been done, which I suspect it has!), etc. I suspect there's a few "one weird thing"-inspired titles out there, influenced by modern 'headline' links (with or without self-awareness), and ''know'' there's a whole history of "my colleague is wrong!" papers, even if not in exactly that wording, pushing the author's own biases in a self-important ranting style, or a rambling one that's an unstructured manifesto of 'thoughts' about all prior 'experts' on a pet issue. There's some deconstruction involved, but with easy reconstruction back to reality. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.113|162.158.158.113]] 19:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | + | ::I read (e.g., for starters) "We put a camera somewhere new" both as very true to the emotional spirit ''and'' a paraphrasing of the true archetype membership being referenced - such as something like "Rat-mounted cameras for remote surveying of sewer pipes" (if that's not already been done, which I suspect it has!), etc. I suspect there's a few "one weird thing"-inspired title out there, influenced by modern 'headline' links (with or without self-awareness), and ''know'' there's a whole history of "my colleague is wrong!" papers, even if not in exactly that wording, pushing the author's own biases in a self-important ranting style, or a rambling one that's an unstructured manifesto of 'thoughts' about all prior 'expeets' on a pet issue. There's some deconstruction involved, but with easy reconstruction back to reality. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.113|162.158.158.113]] 19:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC) |
− | | |
− | == Derivatives ==
| |
− | | |
− | Should this (and any others, which I think likely exist or are about to) go in the main article?
| |
− | https://twitter.com/GreenBankObserv/status/1388148786707406854
| |
− | | |
− | [[File:2456-radioastronomy.jpeg|500px]]
| |
− | | |
− | "With apologies to Mr. Munroe, may we present: Types of Radio Astronomy Papers"
| |
− | | |
− | — [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 18:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | : These are good fun, but I don't think we are gonna put it up in image form in the main article. Maybe a section of external links will do. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.165.235|162.158.165.235]] 00:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | :: I don't think that links are a very effective way to show these. I feel like they need to be a gallery. Perhaps it should be a separate wiki page that is linked from the main article?
| |
− | | |
− | ::Here are some more:
| |
− | {| class="wikitable"
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/neil_chilson/status/1388216386967715846 || Privacy Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/SamLMontano/status/1388268078279049217 || Disaster Science Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/jfbastien/status/1388229180211404803 || C++ Standards papers
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/waiterich/status/1388207060412682247 || Scientific Paper (Food, Land, and Natural Climate Solutions Version)
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/stefan_d_jevtic/status/1388192045920137216 || Hematology
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/jeffpeapod/status/1388185831140118529 || Papers for Grad Students
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/EdinburghKnee/status/1388069182642794496 || Ortho Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/j_remy_green/status/1387960392954138624 || Law Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/JavierApfeld/status/1387891336515362819 || Aging Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/Gabeincognito/status/1387873643435216897 || Infosec Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/acarriebear/status/1387870050581889024 || Toxicology
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/yesitsnicholas/status/1387865583908114432 || Neuroscience
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/nexel_art/status/1388263392545280009 || Archeology
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/skinnyfatPhD/status/1388253551013498882 || Metabolism
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/zamanian_/status/1388179675806158848 || Parasitology
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/PWGTennant/status/1387734254960975881 || Epidemiology and Public Health
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/DrIanKellar/status/1387760304818372620 || Health Psychology
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/nappqm/status/1388098251136589824 || Pest Science
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/theangelremiel/status/1388134620219297793 || Clinical Paper
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/plantspipettes/status/1387825850372997121 || Plant science
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/girlandkat/status/1388030240358768642 || Planetary Science
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/Nesquixotic/status/1387848121342853122 || History
| |
− | |-
| |
− | |
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | https://twitter.com/AndrewBarnas/status/1388161745684996098 || Scientific Paper PAYWALL meta-joke
| |
− | |}
| |
− | :: — [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 13:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | The meme is now so popular there is an article in the atlantic about it; maybe that should be included:
| |
− | https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/05/xkcd-science-paper-meme-nails-academic-publishing/618810/
| |
− | :: --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.113|162.158.89.113]] 14:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
| |