Editing Talk:2859: Oceanography Gift
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: Randall says that molecules intended for the Med ''may'' be returned as undeliverable - not that they ''will''. I would read that to mean that they're more likely to end up back where they started than they are to make it to a destination in the Med, in which case the current explanation is a bit off base.[[Special:Contributions/172.71.242.37|172.71.242.37]] 09:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC) | : Randall says that molecules intended for the Med ''may'' be returned as undeliverable - not that they ''will''. I would read that to mean that they're more likely to end up back where they started than they are to make it to a destination in the Med, in which case the current explanation is a bit off base.[[Special:Contributions/172.71.242.37|172.71.242.37]] 09:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
β | : I'm not sure the overall premise is accurate; the paper is dependent on very low probability pathways, using the ability of algae to reproduce in those regions to give billions of chances of hitting those difficult pathways. The water in the bottle doesn't reproduce. | + | : I'm not sure the overall premise is accurate; the paper is dependent on very low probability pathways, using the ability of algae to reproduce in those regions to give billions of chances of hitting those difficult pathways. The water in the bottle doesn't reproduce. |
β |