Editing Talk:30: Donner
![]() |
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The indication is that they were waiting a long time for the table and decided to eat one of their companions. {{unsigned|64.85.162.210}} | The indication is that they were waiting a long time for the table and decided to eat one of their companions. {{unsigned|64.85.162.210}} | ||
− | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well. [[User:Torappu|Torappu]] ([[User talk:Torappu|talk]]) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well. [[User:Torappu|Torappu]] ([[User talk:Torappu|talk]]) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ||
---- | ---- | ||
I disagree with the original interpretation. The party of three was, I believe, more likely concerned by an additional, undepicted party, also waiting to eat at the establishment, and possibly fearing for their own safety from said cannibalism.--[[User:StrangerDanger|StrangerDanger]] ([[User talk:StrangerDanger|talk]]) 20:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC) | I disagree with the original interpretation. The party of three was, I believe, more likely concerned by an additional, undepicted party, also waiting to eat at the establishment, and possibly fearing for their own safety from said cannibalism.--[[User:StrangerDanger|StrangerDanger]] ([[User talk:StrangerDanger|talk]]) 20:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | My interpretation - after reading the above explanation - is that the Donner was a party of four, who had preordered a table at Joe. But when these three arrived, they had just eaten the fourth person (as a snack before leaving home...?) And then they realized that they are not really hungry anymore - when Joe asks them in. Joe obviously knows they are the Donner - and they do not deny this. /Kynde [[Special:Contributions/193.163.223.34|193.163.223.34]] 18:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |