Difference between revisions of "Talk:798: Adjectives"
(Created page with "The continued validity of some of these results is stochastic as shit, but to believe that they won't eventually change is just jejune as shit. (2 down, 4 more to go) --~~~~") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The continued validity of some of these results is stochastic as shit, but to believe that they won't eventually change is just jejune as shit. (2 down, 4 more to go) --[[Special:Contributions/68.97.21.122|68.97.21.122]] 06:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | The continued validity of some of these results is stochastic as shit, but to believe that they won't eventually change is just jejune as shit. (2 down, 4 more to go) --[[Special:Contributions/68.97.21.122|68.97.21.122]] 06:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | You would think that "improper as shit" would actually have more hits than that. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.87|173.245.54.87]] 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think a better comparison would be substituting "as fuck" for "as shit." I found more results for "'improper as fuck'" than for "'improper as shit' -xkcd". I added the -xkcd because otherwise many of the results would be xkcd references. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.36|108.162.216.36]] 00:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | And the day after xkcd published this comic, results for "f***ing peristeronic" jumped off the charts (as was the case with other xkcd comics :-) ). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.150|108.162.221.150]] 00:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Boy, Randall predicting the future with fungible there... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.5|172.70.162.5]] 13:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:23, 22 January 2022
The continued validity of some of these results is stochastic as shit, but to believe that they won't eventually change is just jejune as shit. (2 down, 4 more to go) --68.97.21.122 06:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
You would think that "improper as shit" would actually have more hits than that. 173.245.54.87 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I think a better comparison would be substituting "as fuck" for "as shit." I found more results for "'improper as fuck'" than for "'improper as shit' -xkcd". I added the -xkcd because otherwise many of the results would be xkcd references. --108.162.216.36 00:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
And the day after xkcd published this comic, results for "f***ing peristeronic" jumped off the charts (as was the case with other xkcd comics :-) ). 108.162.221.150 00:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Boy, Randall predicting the future with fungible there... 172.70.162.5 13:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
