Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Comics with red annotations"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Does 1725: Linear Regression qualify? --~~~~")
 
(But, as you pointed out elsewhere, multiple times, this is not explaining xkcd at all...)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Does [[1725: Linear Regression]] qualify? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
 
Does [[1725: Linear Regression]] qualify? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
 +
:I personally think so, but I'm on the fence about adding it. We should see what others think before adding it. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |<span style="font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:16pt;color:red;">DollarStoreBa'al</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]</sup>[[DSBContribs |'''''My life choices''''']] 18:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:45, 12 June 2025

Does 1725: Linear Regression qualify? --FaviFake (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

I personally think so, but I'm on the fence about adding it. We should see what others think before adding it. --DollarStoreBa'alConverseMy life choices 18:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)