Difference between revisions of "Template talk:xkcd"
m (Waldir moved page Template talk:Xkcd to Template talk:xkcd: page titles are case-sensitive now) |
(→Latest edit: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I think in both cases we can simply use Mediawiki's [[Special:LinkSearch]], e.g. [[Special:LinkSearch/xkcd.com]] --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 12:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | :I think in both cases we can simply use Mediawiki's [[Special:LinkSearch]], e.g. [[Special:LinkSearch/xkcd.com]] --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 12:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I put them in, and if there are better tools for tracking references to, say, xkcd.com, then by all means, let's leverage those instead. I'll take out the numbered category, and we can see how it goes... -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 13:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | ::I put them in, and if there are better tools for tracking references to, say, xkcd.com, then by all means, let's leverage those instead. I'll take out the numbered category, and we can see how it goes... -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 13:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Latest edit == | ||
| + | |||
| + | A possibly quite useful {{diff|401245|edit}}, just done there. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Might I suggest that, to build upon "To link to an explanation of a specific comic, use [[Template:exp]]." it might be better to say "...an explanation on this site, use...". | ||
| + | |||
| + | Although I'm not sure why someone would {{exp|1234|link to anything here like this}} rather than [[1234|link to anything here like ''this'']]. Is that template even needed? | ||
Revision as of 19:22, 10 December 2025
Removing added category
Using this template adds a category to the page called "Links to xkcd #". The template also adds a category called "Links to xkcd.com". Seems to me that there's a bit of redundancy there. Personally, I think a category telling us that the page links to a certain comic is rather unnecessary. It would cause major category spam on pages listing a large number of links to different xkcd articles. As well, I can't really think of any practical use for the category. The "Links to xkcd.com" category could have potential use when combined with AWB, but having both makes it completely redundant. At any rate, I propose we remove the "Links to xkcd #" category from the template. Omega Talk • Contribs 09:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think in both cases we can simply use Mediawiki's Special:LinkSearch, e.g. Special:LinkSearch/xkcd.com --Waldir (talk) 12:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Latest edit
A possibly quite useful edit, just done there.
Might I suggest that, to build upon "To link to an explanation of a specific comic, use Template:exp." it might be better to say "...an explanation on this site, use...".
Although I'm not sure why someone would link to anything here like this rather than link to anything here like this. Is that template even needed?
