Talk:3143: Question Mark

Surely it should read CharlieApostraphe’s Angels, right? KelOfTheStars! (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

You apostrophe re almast right period. tilde tilde tilde tilde 2607:FB91:7914:D333:3D03:FB75:B160:75F4 03:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

You still have to put the punctuation mark after the word open parenthesis (in this case comma, the apostrophe end parenthesis) btw period. tilde tilde tilde tilde TheTrainsKid (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Someone should do a grammar tag or whatever comma, like the citation needed tag comma, that links to this comic period. tilde tilde tilde tilde TheTrainsKid (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

guys (sorry first time commenting so i know that this is formatted wrong) can we not put the names of the formatting in the discription? i literally came to this page to try to figure out what the titletext was trying to say, only to find just as much (if not more) confusion on a page that was meant to remove confusion.

Seconded, as fun as it probably is, it's also incredibly difficult to follow. 2601:681:A80:F890:E8FF:E5A3:E698:22CF 04:38, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Bthardamz

Mhm period. Save the flavored text for titles and the comment section period. very difficult to read ellipsis... tilde tilde tilde tilde 2605:59C8:22F0:3310:1EB6:FF4:46E:74F5 04:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Even if we decide to keep it in the explanation comma, it definitely shouldn't be in the transcript period. tilde tilde tilde tilde Barmar (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

that's entirely fair comma, I got the idea to match the explanation formatting with the comic content from 1285: Third Way comma, though in that instance it's way less obtrusive period. tilde tilde tilde tilde 137.25.230.78 07:30, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

thirding the above. if i'm on this site it's so i can understand the parts of the comic that confused me. the current formatting is directly hostile to that goal. 2600:6C64:64F0:8470:85E0:2F90:F707:90A8 04:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

How about a compromise solution of putting the punctuation labels in small print? Something like this should work, though it was being screwy when I tested in the preview here: example Solomon (talk) 05:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

P.S. On my phone, it seems to only work in Desktop Mode, so maybe it's a problem with the CSS for the mobile layout? Solomon (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

... This is a thing people do? Glad to be unfamiliar. 52.213.77.206 07:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

I did this just yesterday; a cat was laying on my hands, and I could type "query" but not shift-questionmark. 47.145.254.54 22:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

This becomes an annoyingly common occurrence if you commonly use speech to text programs. It is not very fun in regular conversation 99.2.109.131 12:37, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Instances in Media: In the Amazing World of Gumball episode "The Line", Gumball refers to "Stellar Odyssey Colon The Force Rehashed". Vandof (talk) 04:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Not really relevant to this website (we're not cataloging these outside of xkcd), but have you seen Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film For Theaters Colon The Soundtrack? 24.177.125.170 08:05, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

This is a thing my friend group can't stop saying, and i thought it was just us. neat! --Mushrooms (talk) 09:37, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Use of that joke in the transcript section - afaik transcript is more or less an accessibility feature. Doing the spelling-out-every-punctuation thing makes the transcript significantly difficult to read, and also it confuses what is a part of the original text and what is a spelled-out punctuation you added. I'm not in favor of having the joke in the transcript section. User670 (talk) 09:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, this is absolutely not the place for it. --Mushrooms (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

The italics section is explicitly opened with the word "italics". Shouldn't it be closed? Or is that implicit in the paragraph break? I'm uncertain if the "Period. Paragraph break." should also be italicized, or if they should be exempt because they're punctuation and formatting indicators. BunsenH (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Interesting reaction on Randall's (Cueball's) part. When people do that, it makes me want to poke them in the eye. Yorkshire Pudding (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Can anyone analyse the spacing between words in the main comic? Is there unusual spacing in Cueball's speech or the caption, compared with Hairy's sentence? 86.8.84.104 00:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 185.219.141.117 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

I added a link to one of those clips fairly early on, but it got deleted. That might have been because I tried to incorporate the weird sounds in the write-up. I put it back, minus the weird sounds. BunsenH (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The gag with the read-alound punctuation was also used about 40 years ago in a sketch in the German Fastnacht classic "Mainz bleibt Mainz" show. (Warning: Anyone commenting about German humor will get their flipperwald gersputet.) 2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D 08:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps there should be more on the selection of Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle as the example of taste for the semi-punchline. I, like Hairy, would put it among the greatest films of all time, but Cueball seems to disagree, and I suspect other jokes in the history of the internet may have referred to it with the same sentiment... - jerodast (talk) 08:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)