Difference between revisions of "Talk:3223: Inflation Timeline"
m (comment, interesting context) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --> | <!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --> | ||
| β | What about the regular/sexy thing? {{unsigned|2a02:26f7:e344:4000:c000::f}} | + | What about the regular/sexy thing? {{unsigned ip|2a02:26f7:e344:4000:c000::f|19:10, 23 March 2026 (UTC)}} |
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_inflation [[Special:Contributions/155.33.87.241|155.33.87.241]] 19:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC) | : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_inflation [[Special:Contributions/155.33.87.241|155.33.87.241]] 19:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: I would say this is an application of the "today's lucky 10,000" concept, but this probably doesn't qualify as a thing that everyone knows by the time they're an adult so the number is probably lower. But I hope this experience of learning something new is still as fun as Coke and Mentos! [[User:Dextrous Fred|Dextrous Fred]] ([[User talk:Dextrous Fred|talk]]) 19:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC) | :: I would say this is an application of the "today's lucky 10,000" concept, but this probably doesn't qualify as a thing that everyone knows by the time they're an adult so the number is probably lower. But I hope this experience of learning something new is still as fun as Coke and Mentos! [[User:Dextrous Fred|Dextrous Fred]] ([[User talk:Dextrous Fred|talk]]) 19:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Fun fact: while debasement of the coinage, rulers melting down coins and resmithing them at lower metal value, has been around for a long time, inflation is pretty new. Inflation calculators for the british pound show pretty flat value until the 1900s despite lots of economic crisis in the 800 years they've been measuring. The US used to use the gold standard, it was only later (gold dollar and dollar standards) that inflation has really been a thing in the US. Thus the 'regular' period of inflation is probably pretty short, about the last 100 years. [[User:WikipedianPolitician|WikipedianPolitician]] ([[User talk:WikipedianPolitician|talk]]) 00:17, 25 March 2026 (UTC) | Fun fact: while debasement of the coinage, rulers melting down coins and resmithing them at lower metal value, has been around for a long time, inflation is pretty new. Inflation calculators for the british pound show pretty flat value until the 1900s despite lots of economic crisis in the 800 years they've been measuring. The US used to use the gold standard, it was only later (gold dollar and dollar standards) that inflation has really been a thing in the US. Thus the 'regular' period of inflation is probably pretty short, about the last 100 years. [[User:WikipedianPolitician|WikipedianPolitician]] ([[User talk:WikipedianPolitician|talk]]) 00:17, 25 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
| + | :When currencies were actually backed by physical reserves (by gold, silver or whatever else) or even ''wrre'' those reserves (bare-faced/coppernosed debasement aside), 'inflation' requires the sudden availability of more of those reserves. Which is possible (sudenly silver from the New World makes its way into the Old World, etc, ''may'' have played a part in the Price Revolution of that era) but isn't as likely to just keep happening on and on (and with opportunities for rapid hyperinflation) when nominal currency is basically tied to nothing but "what financial people think it should be, when trying to compete with other financial people". [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:57, 25 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:57, 25 March 2026
What about the regular/sexy thing? 2a02:26f7:e344:4000:c000::f (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2026 (UTC) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_inflation 155.33.87.241 19:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- I would say this is an application of the "today's lucky 10,000" concept, but this probably doesn't qualify as a thing that everyone knows by the time they're an adult so the number is probably lower. But I hope this experience of learning something new is still as fun as Coke and Mentos! Dextrous Fred (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- Not so sure closing this gap in knowledge would really count as "lucky", but each to their own. 204.77.3.72 00:07, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- definitely not a sentence i expected to read on xkcd. raeb 05:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Not so sure closing this gap in knowledge would really count as "lucky", but each to their own. 204.77.3.72 00:07, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Since economic inflation is money becoming more worthless and therefore de-facto vanishing, it would be better represented by body deflation. That is - character becoming increasingly more gaunt and skinny, until only pile of bones remain (or if cartoonish, until he becomes thinner than fishing line and collapses into a point). Dunno what sort of weirdo would use images of starving people (e.g. victims of nazi death camps) for sexual gratification. --User 8496351 (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Economic inflation is "more units of money needed for the same product/service", so entirely in line with "a need for more apparent body mass/volume of the same person" (e.g. BBLs, etc). At least as I understand both processes, which I may not entirely. 82.132.237.186 11:47, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I've obviously led a sheltered the last seventy years as I've never heard of body inflation.--2A00:23CC:D248:8901:D030:98E4:E22B:D2EF 08:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- New to me too. But further proof of Rule 34 :-) 2A12:F43:143E:0:C172:A03D:12FE:51AA 11:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)dww-uk
- I would say this is an application of the "today's lucky 10,000" concept, but this probably doesn't qualify as a thing that everyone knows by the time they're an adult so the number is probably lower. But I hope this experience of learning something new is still as fun as Coke and Mentos! Dextrous Fred (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
The X axis is weird. The labeled ticks are logarithmic, but the unlabeled ticks are linear, and there are only 8 of them.Jp5424 (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- The X axis most likely has a logarithmic base interval of 10/8, going from 10^-40 to 10^-38.75, 10^-37.5, etc. 2001:1C02:1A9D:9700:2416:3C14:B648:3FD0 19:12, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
I don't find the current explanation of sexy coexisting with regular convincing. I think there is something missing. --80.187.75.215 22:03, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- 174: That's What SHE Said... 81.179.199.253 00:11, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Fun fact: while debasement of the coinage, rulers melting down coins and resmithing them at lower metal value, has been around for a long time, inflation is pretty new. Inflation calculators for the british pound show pretty flat value until the 1900s despite lots of economic crisis in the 800 years they've been measuring. The US used to use the gold standard, it was only later (gold dollar and dollar standards) that inflation has really been a thing in the US. Thus the 'regular' period of inflation is probably pretty short, about the last 100 years. WikipedianPolitician (talk) 00:17, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
- When currencies were actually backed by physical reserves (by gold, silver or whatever else) or even wrre those reserves (bare-faced/coppernosed debasement aside), 'inflation' requires the sudden availability of more of those reserves. Which is possible (sudenly silver from the New World makes its way into the Old World, etc, may have played a part in the Price Revolution of that era) but isn't as likely to just keep happening on and on (and with opportunities for rapid hyperinflation) when nominal currency is basically tied to nothing but "what financial people think it should be, when trying to compete with other financial people". 81.179.199.253 21:57, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
