Difference between revisions of "Talk:283: Projection"
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I am sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I do not understand why this is the case. | I am sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I do not understand why this is the case. | ||
I mean, the different LEDs of the monitor ''are'' beaming on their own after all, so why should the sum of their lights not arrive at a surface in the same order as it is on the screen, so that you would see a "projection"? {{unsigned ip|162.158.18.16}} | I mean, the different LEDs of the monitor ''are'' beaming on their own after all, so why should the sum of their lights not arrive at a surface in the same order as it is on the screen, so that you would see a "projection"? {{unsigned ip|162.158.18.16}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Could somebody remove the question above? I understand now, why monitors do not project images as a whole. | ||
+ | [[Special:Contributions/162.158.202.202|162.158.202.202]] 12:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:50, 22 January 2017
- Possible Reference to 289
- Alone in Alt Text
The alt text for this comic reads "Out in a field, not another car for miles, silence but for the rain drumming on the sunroof, warm thick folds of the blanket hiding wordless fingertip games...", and I can't help but suspect that the "wordless fingertip games" are referencing the Fibonacci sequence fingertip thing in 289: Alone. Anyone else catch that? --Misson20000 (talk) 04:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I do not understand why this is the case. I mean, the different LEDs of the monitor are beaming on their own after all, so why should the sum of their lights not arrive at a surface in the same order as it is on the screen, so that you would see a "projection"? 162.158.18.16 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Could somebody remove the question above? I understand now, why monitors do not project images as a whole. 162.158.202.202 12:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)